K&L Gates' Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project Provides Aid to Victims of Revenge Porn
The Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project is based in K&L Gates and provides pro bono assistance to the victims of revenge porn.
February 19, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
The goal behind the Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project is relatively straightforward: Provide pro bono legal relief to people who have had nude/sexually explicit photos or videos uploaded to the internet without their consent.
“Revenge porn” is one term for it. A statute in Florida, where CCRLP co-founder Elisa D'Amico practices at the K&L Gates office in Miami, refers to such behavior as “sexual cyber harassment.”
Whatever terminology is applied, the impact tends to be consistently devastating.
D'Amico and her colleagues, who convinced K&L Gates to back this pro bono project, have seen it first hand. And they have also watched their program grow quickly in the years since it launched.
“(Victims) suffer from PTSD, other sorts of emotional and stress disorders. I've had clients who've had skin flare-ups, their hair has fallen out, they've gained weight, they've lost weight, all sorts of physical problems. And there's a higher rate of suicide,” D'Amico said.
For most victims, the top priority is getting the offending material taken down off of the web immediately, but the team of 75 to 90 K&L Gates volunteers spanning three continents is equipped to provide other services befitting the requests that come in from the project's website.
CCRLP can file lawsuits to unmask the identity of anonymous actors, draft cease-and-desist letters and help de-index results from search engines. Sometimes victims just need referrals to counseling.
D'Amico and co-founder David Bateman, a partner focusing on internet and technology law in the firm's Seattle office, pitched the idea to the K&L Gates brass without any income requirements attached. Today they receive between three and five applications a day.
“We believe that this is a violation of civil rights, more specifically someone's cyber civil rights,” D'Amico said.
Bateman wasn't all that familiar with the problem of revenge porn prior to D'Amico approaching him about the project before its launch in 2014. He's since learned that there is no limit to the human imagination when it comes to torturing people online.
Legal recourse is not impossible, but even victims with financial resources can be stymied by the difficulty of locating an attorney with the right skill set to take on a revenge porn case.
“It requires knowing how to deal with online platforms and anonymous online activity,” Bateman said.
As with most things related to the internet, one of the prevailing factors is speed. The sooner the offending material can be taken down, the easier it is to prevent it from spreading to other corners of the web.
Bateman said that it's easier today to get platforms with federal immunity for user-generated content to remove revenge porn content than it was even four years ago. Previously, most of their takedown requests were made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which applied only if the victim was the original author of the photo or video in question.
“There's been a lot of progress over the last several years where many of the mainstream sites are willing to go beyond that and they are willing to take down material, even if it is not copyrighted, if it is revenge porn,” Bateman said.
He's never found there to be great difficulty in seeking legal recourse against the parties responsible for posting the material. On the civil side, there are tracks like intentional infliction of emotional distress or invasion of privacy— but actually finding the party responsible can be more challenging.
K&L Gates' in-house cyberforensics personnel can sometimes use information gleaned from an anonymous threat—or in some cases a subpoena—to build a trail back to the source, even if that source is hiding behind a fake name or profile.
“We've seen even the most sophisticated and industry tech folk engage in this behavior and sort of slip up,” D'Amico said.
D'Amico's work on this issue has garnered her many accolades, including her being named Attorney of the Year in 2015 by Legaltech News' affiliate publication Daily Business Review.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn-House Gurus Say Inattention to Human Side of Tech Adoption Can Derail Best-Laid Plans
5 minute readK&L Gates Looks to Extend Gen AI Expertise to Access to Justice Fight
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250