More Tech, More Problems: The Downsides to Millennial Attorneys Working Remotely
As more millennials take the reins in the legal profession, working remotely is on the rise. But with technological advancements, some note lawyers' mental well-being may suffer.
February 20, 2019 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Most millennial attorneys are adopting technology that allows them to work remotely. But some observers caution that the easy accessibility of tech could lead to burnout and mental illness among current and future lawyers.
Working remotely is on the rise in the legal industry as law firms take cues from their clients in offering flexible work arrangements. Millennial attorneys entering the workforce represent a significant pivot in how law firms and departments allow lawyers to use technology.
“Millennials came of age without cellphones but came up professionally with cellphones,” said Shannon Murphy, a managing director of MLA Global who consults with Am Law firms. She also noted that Generation Z, who were born after 1996 and aren't quite in the legal profession yet, but are filling law schools, show no sign in slowing down in working remotely. “They don't know another way and are very comfortable connecting digitally.”
Law firms have responded to the growing request to work remotely by switching to cloud-based architectures to allow their attorneys access to encrypted and secure virtual environments, said AbacusNext's chief solutions architect Tomas Suros, who consults law firms on their software.
But such technology is expanding work hours, as lawyers can easily continue their work from anywhere digitally.
“I think there's an awareness that is growing, that the ability to be connected is [so] great, we no longer have to wait by the phone. … At the same time, it can increase the burnout, because you are always available,” said Nicole Leet, an Atlanta-based Gray, Rust, St. Amand, Moffett & Brieske partner and president of the State Bar of Georgia's Young Lawyers Division.
She added, “I think the conversation will shift to stopping the potential burnout.”
Lauren Stiller Rikleen, a lawyer consultant and author of “You Raised Us—Now Work With Us: Millennials, Career Success, and Building Strong Workplace Teams,” noted there is evidence of increased anxiety and depression in young adults. Society, and the legal industry, haven't addressed that working remotely isn't freeing up employees' time, she said.
“We aren't physically wired to not shut down. We don't talk about that; we don't pay attention to that enough,” Rikleen said. “We are starting to see increased data about that. We should be sounding the alarm around this issue.”
While all lawyers face potential burnout from constantly working, those that work remotely may have increased anxiety, Rikleen added.
“I would say the worry comes from the signals they receive,” she explained. “I'm talking with younger lawyers that are working remotely from work … and they get mixed signals from the office about how that will be viewed in the law office.”
She continued, “The message that they get is if you want to be seen as a committed lawyer, you need to be here all the time,” which can be a disconnect from the law firm's or department's written policy.
Christian George, an Akerman office managing partner and president of the Florida Bar's Young Lawyers Division, noted lawyers also face a pressure from clients to be on call.
“There's a pressure that we all feel to be flexible because we feel if we aren't, the client will find someone more flexible,” George said.
For incoming Generation Z, the struggle for work-life balance against the tide of technology and client demands will likely only intensify.
“[The data] suggests that the post-millennial generation will have the same experience as the millennial generation and more so,” Rikleen said. The pressures seem to be more intense, she added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 2Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 3Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 4Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 5Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250