Twitter Expands Transparency Policies for Political Ads Ahead of EU, India and Australia Elections
Twitter is the latest tech company to update its political ad policy, increasing ad transparency in Australia, India and the European Union before their 2019 elections.
February 21, 2019 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Twitter became the latest social media platform to change its political campaigning ad policies Tuesday, announcing enhanced transparency features ahead of elections in Europe, India and Australia.
Social media companies, including Twitter, have faced criticism in recent years for their platforms' role in spreading politically motivated misinformation and hate speech. As of March 11, Twitter will only allow certified advertisers to run political campaign ads on its platform in all European Union member states, India and Australia, as all three face major elections in 2019.
Prospective political advertisers must apply for certification, Karen White, Twitter's director of public policy, Europe, said in a blog post Tuesday.
“Once proof of identity is verified, and advertisers meet our eligibility requirements, a letter with an access code will be posted to their address to confirm they are located within the EU,” White said in the post. “This will ensure that only EU-based individuals can advertise political campaign content on the service.”
She said Twitter will also publicly publish political ads' billing information, ad spend, targeted demographics and impressions per tweet in the platform's ads transparency center. An elections team composed of trust and safety, legal, public policy and other departments will work to prevent election interference on the platform.
The San Francisco-based company launched similar political campaign policies in the U.S. in May 2018, ahead of the country's November midterm elections. Last month, Carlos Monje Jr., Twitter's director of public policy and philanthropy, U.S. and Canada, published a review of the company's midterm election efforts.
Monje said Twitter identified some potential foreign attempts at election interference during the midterms, but found most voter suppression efforts were domestic. Still, he said in his post, threats could change in future elections.
“Elections are coming up around the world, and our goal is to protect their integrity to the best of our ability and to take the learnings from each with us,” he said. “Our role, as ever, is to do our best to stay one step ahead while remaining humble in the face of potential new challenges.”
Other U.S. tech companies, including Google and Facebook, have also revised political ad policies during elections. In May 2018, Facebook prohibited foreign actors from buying political ads in Ireland prior to the country's vote on a referendum to repeal the country's constitutional ban on abortion.
Menlo Park, California-based Facebook has been the main subject of international criticism for failing to curb fake news on its platform prior to the 2016 U.S. election.
“Our company approach is to build tools to increase transparency around political advertising so that people know who is paying for the ads they are seeing, and to ensure any organisation running a political ad is located in that country,” Facebook said in a May 2018 blog post announcing its policy in Ireland.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Morgan Lewis Says Global Clients Are Noticing ‘Expanded Capacity’ After Kramer Merger in Paris
- 2'Reverse Robin Hood': Capital One Swarmed With Class Actions Alleging Theft of Influencer Commissions in January
- 3Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement
- 4How We Won It: Latham Secures Back-to-Back ITC Patent Wins for California Companies
- 5Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250