Startup Intaker Enlists Chatbots to Assess Potential Clients Before They Reach Lawyers
Startup Intaker's web app uses chatbots as the first line of communication when potential clients seek an attorney, matching a client's need to an attorney's practice.
February 22, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
Startup Intaker matches prospective client's needs with lawyers' practice areas, using artificial intelligence to gauge a matter before it walks into a lawyer's office.
Intaker was founded in 2018 and is an offshoot of Idemandu, an artificial intelligence company that provides a free virtual assistant through text messages with the aim to connect local service providers, such as fitness trainers and nutritionists, to consumers. While Idemandu is still operating and is offered through Google Assistant, Intaker is a different app that law firms can download from the Intaker website.
When asked about the impetus for launching the app, Intaker and Idemandu co-founder Pooya Abka said face-to-face consultations are draining lawyers of valuable time. “I know for a fact that a lot of law firms are spending a lot of time on things that aren't their core practices. If you think about it, it takes away justice from their clients.”
Intaker leverages AI to match a client's need to an attorney's practice. Attorneys “can train the AI and let the AI know their practice preferences. [Then] the AI analyzes all of that and will set up a [chatbot] for that specific attorney,” Abka explained.
The AI-powered chatbot can be made available through a firm's website or through an Intaker-provided link for clients to access. The chatbot's interview isn't customizable per attorney, but attorneys can set their practice and client communication preferences.
After clients answer the chatbot's questions, Intaker automatically schedules meetings with prospects who meet an attorney's practice areas. If a case isn't a good fit for an attorney, the lawyer can refer the case to someone else.
In addition to these chatbots, Intaker also offers marketing capabilities that include measuring how advertisements are performing. ”It can make the time spent on marketing practices and invest it in actual legal services,” Abka said.
So far, Intaker has garnered the most interest from solo practitioners and boutique firms, he added. However, firms of any size can purchase and use the app.
Abka said in the future, Intaker also plans to offer AI-powered pricing suggestions for legal matters. A similar tool has been launched by Neota Logic.
To be sure chatbots aren't new to the legal industry, LexisNexis, for example, has paired attorneys with a chatbot to more easily connect them with its data. Legal service provider DoNotPay has also made waves with its ability to appeal parking tickets and other civil court matters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
- 2Slideshow: Jewish Bar Association of Georgia Marks 1st Year With Hanukkah Party
- 3Holland & Knight Launches Export Control Disputes and Advocacy Team
- 4Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
- 5Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250