Philadelphia Mayor's Deleted Texts Could Be Recovered, Forensic Experts Say
A politician's deleted texts may still be recoverable, but time is of the essence.
February 25, 2019 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney grabbed local headlines when it was revealed he periodically deletes text messages from his personal cellphone that he also uses for work.
Kenney's “bring your own device” approach for work is a growing trend in the economy, including the legal industry. But the mayor's deletion habit could be seen as a slight to government transparency. Still, while recovering the mayor's deleted texts from years ago may be difficult, it's not impossible, experts said.
When The Philadelphia Inquirer requested the mayor's text messages from July 2018 regarding city business, the newspaper was told those texts—and years' worth of previous texts—were deleted, a practice Kenney's spokesperson said the mayor did “habitually” to clear space on his phone, according to the article.
Kenney's text messages regarding government work could be deemed a public record according to Pennsylvania's Right-to-Know Law. Under the state law, a record is defined as “any information regardless of its physical form or character that documents a transaction or activity of an agency and is created, received or retained pursuant to law or in connection with a transaction, business or activity of an agency.”
Kenney has maintained his deleted text messages were short and straightforward correspondences. Kenney told local news his text messages consisted of, “'You're on your way,' 'yeah' 'what time will you be there?', 'soon.'” He added, “It's not like I go and write a whole speech in a text on a cellphone.”
Craig Staudenmaier, a Right to Know and media law attorney, noted the law doesn't prohibit deleting texts.
“Nothing would prohibit him from deleting them, you would have to look at the city's record retention policy,” he noted. “It doesn't necessarily mean he did anything wrong, it just depends if they were public records and they needed to be retained.”
“We do not know if records were deleted. We know that texts were deleted because the mayor said that,” added Terry Mutchler, a lawyer and former executive director of Pennsylvania's Office of Open Records.
Still, even if records were not kept, deleted texts aren't necessarily lost in the abyss, according to forensic and e-discovery professionals. But retrieval is not an easy or straightforward process.
“It is very possible to recover data off of a phone after it's been deleted, but it might not be everything, and anyone that's watched 'CSI' will probably be disappointed by real-life forensics,” said Christine Payne, who co-chairs Kirkland & Ellis' e-discovery committee.
“If someone is hoping that there's a magical backup for everything that's created [they're] going to have a reality check because that doesn't exist,” Payne added.
Recovering deleted texts can be done by scouring a phone's cloud storage backup and any connected devices.
Jason Silva, director of Philadelphia-based digital forensics and e-discovery company Cornerstone Discovery, noted phones are backed up periodically and those backups contain text messages. “That backup would tell us the state of the phone,” he said.
However, time is of the essence when attempting to recover deleted text messages, experts said. Kyle McArdle, Cornerstone Discovery's web developer, noted that when a text message is deleted, it isn't initially wiped from the phone. Instead, it's marked as deleted and as time passes and text messages culminate, the text marked as deleted is overwritten.
As for software that can assist in recovering deleted texts, digital forensic professionals pointed to solutions like Cellebrite, which also offers e-discovery tools, and QMobile, a program from e-discovery provider QDiscovery, among others. Such software and a quick response to retrieve deleted data are vital for a successful recovery of texts, Kirkland & Ellis' Payne said.
“The sooner you can get the physical device to the professional, the better; so they can work their magic and tell you what is available or not,” Payne said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Pauses Deadline for Federal Workers to Accept Trump Resignation Offer
- 2DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 3'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
- 4Wave of Commercial Real Estate Refinance Could Drown Property Owners
- 5Redeveloping Real Estate After Natural Disasters: Challenges, Strategies and Opportunities
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250