ACEDS Goes to Washington: E-Discovery Inside the White House
The stakes don't get much higher for e-discovery than at the White House, where ACEDS was asked to delve into some the subtle complexities that impacts how information is preserved in the Executive Office.
February 26, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
Your last business trip is about to look pretty tame: On Feb. 13, representatives from the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS) visited the Executive Office at the White House to deliver an on-site training session to 26 employees specializing in information governance, records management and IT.
The visit—which focused on the essentials of e-discovery—marked a first for ACEDS, which has conducted many live training sessions in the past, but never at the behest of the federal government.
“You don't think of yourself doing those kinds of things,” said Mary Mack, executive director of ACEDS.
Joining Mack onsite at the White House was Shannon Bales of FTI Consulting, David Greetham of Ricoh USA, and ACEDS vice president of engagement Kaylee Walstad. The group was invited to present by Kenya Parrish-Dixon, assistant director of the division of litigation technology and analysis at the Federal Trade Commission.
“She wanted the staff to have a comprehensive end-to-end training so that even if it was just somebody who had a small part as a part of their larger duties in the e-discovery process, that they would understand what the other players on the team would need from them or the kinds of decisions that they would make,” Mack said.
ACEDS usually provides live training to what Mack called “serial litigants,” entities like financial institutions that are highly regulated and constantly producing documents of one kind or another. The aim is to help them reduce duplicate data and learn techniques to thin the information herd.
“Things that we take for granted in the e-discovery community, organizations that haven't faced that, they're just starting from scratch. I'm not saying that that's where the White House was, but that's one of the benefits, the ability to reduce the amount of data you need to have human eyes on,” Mack said.
Traditional businesses also typically have a records retention schedule in place so that documents are destroyed once they are no longer useful to business. Taking that into consideration, a typical ACEDS session would stress the importance of preservation.
But such warnings might have come across as a little redundant in the Executive Office of the White House. There's a law, the Presidential Records Act of 1978, requiring the preservation of all presidential records. The office has had over 40 years to put the necessary procedures in place to do just that.
In addition to changing the focus on preservation, the training also had to insert some placeholders to address the alternate sets of rules for regulatory, congressional and criminal procedures that would be of particular relevance at the White House.
“There are different risk levels, criminal being a very high risk and a congressional inquiry being a high risk, maybe underneath the criminal. Regulatory would be next and then civil litigation and then public records requests,” Mack said.
Also complicating things somewhat are the different standards surrounding civil litigation and, say, a public records request, including when and how a piece of information can be redacted. Trying to address every eventuality in the course of a single seminar could make for a long day at the office.
“There were some significant areas where these are the places you need to consult your in-house legal team to explain what are you responding to,” Mack said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 2'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 3Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 4These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 5'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250