ACEDS Goes to Washington: E-Discovery Inside the White House
The stakes don't get much higher for e-discovery than at the White House, where ACEDS was asked to delve into some the subtle complexities that impacts how information is preserved in the Executive Office.
February 26, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
The White House in Washington, D.C. at night. July 9, 2018.
Your last business trip is about to look pretty tame: On Feb. 13, representatives from the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS) visited the Executive Office at the White House to deliver an on-site training session to 26 employees specializing in information governance, records management and IT.
The visit—which focused on the essentials of e-discovery—marked a first for ACEDS, which has conducted many live training sessions in the past, but never at the behest of the federal government.
“You don't think of yourself doing those kinds of things,” said Mary Mack, executive director of ACEDS.
Joining Mack onsite at the White House was Shannon Bales of FTI Consulting, David Greetham of Ricoh USA, and ACEDS vice president of engagement Kaylee Walstad. The group was invited to present by Kenya Parrish-Dixon, assistant director of the division of litigation technology and analysis at the Federal Trade Commission.
“She wanted the staff to have a comprehensive end-to-end training so that even if it was just somebody who had a small part as a part of their larger duties in the e-discovery process, that they would understand what the other players on the team would need from them or the kinds of decisions that they would make,” Mack said.
ACEDS usually provides live training to what Mack called “serial litigants,” entities like financial institutions that are highly regulated and constantly producing documents of one kind or another. The aim is to help them reduce duplicate data and learn techniques to thin the information herd.
“Things that we take for granted in the e-discovery community, organizations that haven't faced that, they're just starting from scratch. I'm not saying that that's where the White House was, but that's one of the benefits, the ability to reduce the amount of data you need to have human eyes on,” Mack said.
Traditional businesses also typically have a records retention schedule in place so that documents are destroyed once they are no longer useful to business. Taking that into consideration, a typical ACEDS session would stress the importance of preservation.
But such warnings might have come across as a little redundant in the Executive Office of the White House. There's a law, the Presidential Records Act of 1978, requiring the preservation of all presidential records. The office has had over 40 years to put the necessary procedures in place to do just that.
In addition to changing the focus on preservation, the training also had to insert some placeholders to address the alternate sets of rules for regulatory, congressional and criminal procedures that would be of particular relevance at the White House.
“There are different risk levels, criminal being a very high risk and a congressional inquiry being a high risk, maybe underneath the criminal. Regulatory would be next and then civil litigation and then public records requests,” Mack said.
Also complicating things somewhat are the different standards surrounding civil litigation and, say, a public records request, including when and how a piece of information can be redacted. Trying to address every eventuality in the course of a single seminar could make for a long day at the office.
“There were some significant areas where these are the places you need to consult your in-house legal team to explain what are you responding to,” Mack said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Pauses Deadline for Federal Workers to Accept Trump Resignation Offer
- 2DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 3'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
- 4Wave of Commercial Real Estate Refinance Could Drown Property Owners
- 5Redeveloping Real Estate After Natural Disasters: Challenges, Strategies and Opportunities
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250