Bill4Time Branches Out to Practice Management
The time-and-billing company has overhauled its software to include practice management metric tracking and a client portal.
February 27, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Bill4Time has expanded into practice management software, bringing along its experience of tracking time and billing for law firms.
Seattle and Pittsburgh-based Bill4Time was acquired by private equity firm Alpine Investors in 2017 for an undisclosed amount. Earlier this month, Alpine combined practice management software company PracticePanther and Bill4Time into ASG LegalTech, according to the ABA Journal.
However, Bill4Time product manager Patrick Vernallis said Bill4Time and PracticePanther will still work as independent brands.
As Bill4Time settles into its new corporate structure, it has ventured into uncharted waters: practice management. After studying the legal industry market and listening to users' feedback, Bill4Time discovered users sought more metric measuring abilities and client communication features, Vernallis said.
What it is: Bill4Time's practice management solution is a cloud-based tool for law firms to track firm metrics, performance goals, client invoices, and reviews and other customizable features.
Vernallis noted the software also contains Bill4Time's “bread and butter” billing options and analytics that law firm customers have grown accustomed to since the company's 2006 inception.
How it works: Bill4Time has a customizable dashboard that can record hourly rates, recent time entries, resource utilization, unpaid clients, daily schedules and other tasks.
Users can also track billable hours and set a billable hours target for a matter. The hours goal can be split between actual work hours and other hours used to market and gain clients, Vernallis noted.
For these dashboard features, users can add specific lawyers or staff members and track their progression individually.
The software also houses specific tabs regarding a user's projects, clients, time and expenses, tasks, scheduling, invoicing, reporting and accounting.
Specifically, the client tab allows users to monitor individual client billing, including the balance and what it was billed for. Similarly, the invoice table enables a user to create invoice templates for clients.
In addition, the tasks tab allows users to set a workflow, including the scheduled and required tasks to complete matters. The tasks can be edited and applied to other matters with similar assignments, Vernallis noted.
Client portal: Currently, Bill4Time's client-facing portal lets users view and pay their legal bill. Clients can also pay via Stripe, LawPay, PayPal or by credit card.
Lawyers can also send an automated message to clients requesting feedback on their services and request they leave a review on Google.
Vernallis said Bill4Time plans to expand the automated online review requests to Facebook and Avvo and include document-sharing capabilities between clients and lawyers. The company noted it will continue to expand the portal to meet customer demands in the future.
“We've seen in the marketplace a growth and need for client engagement,” Vernallis noted. “We want to build out our portal to enhance that.”
Competition: Bill4Time's competitors include legal practice management platforms Clio, MyCase, Rocket Matter and CosmoLex.
However, Vernallis believes that Bill4Time differentiates from others due to its accounting and billing expertise.
He noted that Bill4Time's reporting metric can conduct unique calculations in-house, such as computing billing on complex origination fees. Users can then send that request to Bill4Time's developers and “take the secrecy out of how lawyers are paid in their firms.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250