Bill4Time Branches Out to Practice Management
The time-and-billing company has overhauled its software to include practice management metric tracking and a client portal.
February 27, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Bill4Time has expanded into practice management software, bringing along its experience of tracking time and billing for law firms.
Seattle and Pittsburgh-based Bill4Time was acquired by private equity firm Alpine Investors in 2017 for an undisclosed amount. Earlier this month, Alpine combined practice management software company PracticePanther and Bill4Time into ASG LegalTech, according to the ABA Journal.
However, Bill4Time product manager Patrick Vernallis said Bill4Time and PracticePanther will still work as independent brands.
As Bill4Time settles into its new corporate structure, it has ventured into uncharted waters: practice management. After studying the legal industry market and listening to users' feedback, Bill4Time discovered users sought more metric measuring abilities and client communication features, Vernallis said.
What it is: Bill4Time's practice management solution is a cloud-based tool for law firms to track firm metrics, performance goals, client invoices, and reviews and other customizable features.
Vernallis noted the software also contains Bill4Time's “bread and butter” billing options and analytics that law firm customers have grown accustomed to since the company's 2006 inception.
How it works: Bill4Time has a customizable dashboard that can record hourly rates, recent time entries, resource utilization, unpaid clients, daily schedules and other tasks.
Users can also track billable hours and set a billable hours target for a matter. The hours goal can be split between actual work hours and other hours used to market and gain clients, Vernallis noted.
For these dashboard features, users can add specific lawyers or staff members and track their progression individually.
The software also houses specific tabs regarding a user's projects, clients, time and expenses, tasks, scheduling, invoicing, reporting and accounting.
Specifically, the client tab allows users to monitor individual client billing, including the balance and what it was billed for. Similarly, the invoice table enables a user to create invoice templates for clients.
In addition, the tasks tab allows users to set a workflow, including the scheduled and required tasks to complete matters. The tasks can be edited and applied to other matters with similar assignments, Vernallis noted.
Client portal: Currently, Bill4Time's client-facing portal lets users view and pay their legal bill. Clients can also pay via Stripe, LawPay, PayPal or by credit card.
Lawyers can also send an automated message to clients requesting feedback on their services and request they leave a review on Google.
Vernallis said Bill4Time plans to expand the automated online review requests to Facebook and Avvo and include document-sharing capabilities between clients and lawyers. The company noted it will continue to expand the portal to meet customer demands in the future.
“We've seen in the marketplace a growth and need for client engagement,” Vernallis noted. “We want to build out our portal to enhance that.”
Competition: Bill4Time's competitors include legal practice management platforms Clio, MyCase, Rocket Matter and CosmoLex.
However, Vernallis believes that Bill4Time differentiates from others due to its accounting and billing expertise.
He noted that Bill4Time's reporting metric can conduct unique calculations in-house, such as computing billing on complex origination fees. Users can then send that request to Bill4Time's developers and “take the secrecy out of how lawyers are paid in their firms.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250