No Time for Tech? Smart Small and Grow, Panel Advises
Automating work practices and document production can help lawyers become more efficient and profitable, but getting started can be the hard part.
February 28, 2019 at 03:00 PM
3 minute read
The “Using Document Automation to Improve Efficiency and Reduce Errors” panel at the ABA Tech Show invited audience members to consider life before the invention of the washing machine, when people would invest up to six hours at time hand-cleaning their garments.
What does this have to do with the way attorneys are engaging—or not—with document automation, you might ask?
“Most of the lawyers in America are hand-washing laundry in their offices,” said panelist Erin Gerstenzang.
A solo practitioner operating under the banner of EHG Law Firm, Gerstenzang told the crowd that she became technology proficient largely out of a desperate attempt to avoid hiring a secretary. Most people attempting to learn how to use new technology in the middle of an already busy workday get frustrated and give up, but Gerstenzang recommended waiting until the weekends so the deadlines aren't flying as fast and furious.
Nerino Petro Jr., her co-panelist and president of the Erickson Group, backed her up.
“Start small. Put your signature block in autocorrect so you don't have to type that every day,” Petro said.
During the session they taught audiences how to do just that. Automation isn't just about saving time. It's also about avoiding errors. By making small tweaks to the autocorrect function inside Microsoft Word, users can prevent the software from misidentifying common fixtures inside legal documents as spelling or grammatical errors.
Quick Parts, also located in Microsoft Word, can be used to prebuild and store phrases or clauses that frequently find their way into letters or legal documents.
While similar text expansion tools are readily available on the marketplace, they may not be where the smart money is headed. “What's trending? Trending is moving everything to the cloud,” Petro said.
Gerstenzang often uses the cloud in her practice to streamline the production of boilerplate documents that tend to recycle the same template or information. She recommended WebMerge, a document generation solution that takes simple pieces of data such as a client's name or a case number and compiles them into the format required for a given legal matter.
Documents can also be sent directly to clients for their e-signature or to collaborating counsel. While using a variety of legal technology can help legal services become more cost-effective, there is one small detail that lawyers should look for when picking a new tool.
“You want to make sure with any of these tools that you're paying attention to are they holding onto this data?” Gerstenzang said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250