No Time for Tech? Smart Small and Grow, Panel Advises
Automating work practices and document production can help lawyers become more efficient and profitable, but getting started can be the hard part.
February 28, 2019 at 03:00 PM
3 minute read
The “Using Document Automation to Improve Efficiency and Reduce Errors” panel at the ABA Tech Show invited audience members to consider life before the invention of the washing machine, when people would invest up to six hours at time hand-cleaning their garments.
What does this have to do with the way attorneys are engaging—or not—with document automation, you might ask?
“Most of the lawyers in America are hand-washing laundry in their offices,” said panelist Erin Gerstenzang.
A solo practitioner operating under the banner of EHG Law Firm, Gerstenzang told the crowd that she became technology proficient largely out of a desperate attempt to avoid hiring a secretary. Most people attempting to learn how to use new technology in the middle of an already busy workday get frustrated and give up, but Gerstenzang recommended waiting until the weekends so the deadlines aren't flying as fast and furious.
Nerino Petro Jr., her co-panelist and president of the Erickson Group, backed her up.
“Start small. Put your signature block in autocorrect so you don't have to type that every day,” Petro said.
During the session they taught audiences how to do just that. Automation isn't just about saving time. It's also about avoiding errors. By making small tweaks to the autocorrect function inside Microsoft Word, users can prevent the software from misidentifying common fixtures inside legal documents as spelling or grammatical errors.
Quick Parts, also located in Microsoft Word, can be used to prebuild and store phrases or clauses that frequently find their way into letters or legal documents.
While similar text expansion tools are readily available on the marketplace, they may not be where the smart money is headed. “What's trending? Trending is moving everything to the cloud,” Petro said.
Gerstenzang often uses the cloud in her practice to streamline the production of boilerplate documents that tend to recycle the same template or information. She recommended WebMerge, a document generation solution that takes simple pieces of data such as a client's name or a case number and compiles them into the format required for a given legal matter.
Documents can also be sent directly to clients for their e-signature or to collaborating counsel. While using a variety of legal technology can help legal services become more cost-effective, there is one small detail that lawyers should look for when picking a new tool.
“You want to make sure with any of these tools that you're paying attention to are they holding onto this data?” Gerstenzang said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1How the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
- 2Debevoise Lures Another SDNY Alum, Adding Criminal Division Chief
- 3Cooley Promotes NY Office Leader to Global Litigation Department Chair
- 4What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
- 5Tuesday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250