Employee or Independent Contractor? The Law Isn't Always So Sure
The gig economy could transform the way companies do business, but it's being hampered by the confusing distinction between employees and independent contractors.
March 01, 2019 at 02:40 PM
3 minute read
Lawyers looking to advise clients dabbling in the gig economy may have their work cut out for them, according to the “Succeeding in the Gig Economy” panel held on Friday at the ABA Tech Show.
According to some Federal Reserve statistics referenced during the presentation, 31 percent of working adults participate in the gig economy for an average of five hours per month.
Employers are happy because it means lower overhead and employees like the flexibility associated with being able to decide when and where they work—but those arrangements can still present all kind of legal complications.
“If you're treating your workers like employees, that's going to be an issue,” said Emily Wajert, an employment associate at Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel.
If that's the case, then how do you delineate an employee from an independent contractor? The answer differs from state to state and leaves plenty of room for interpretation.
Wajert and Basha Rubin, co-founder and CEO of Priori, laid out two of the more common approaches. The Economic Realities Test has been utilized by entities like the Department of Labor and by states like Pennsylvania. It looks closely at the nature of the work being performed filtered through the tenants of integrality, managerial skill, relative investment, permanence of relationship and degree of control.
The ABC Test, on the other hand, has been the source of great contention for companies reliant upon the services of independent contractors in California. It assumes that anyone is an employee if their work is a central part of the core business.
“It's more difficult for employers who want to categorize their workers as independent contractors to meet,” Wajert said.
However, there are things that attorneys can advise their clients to do to help make the distinction between employee and independent contractor less ambiguous. Job training, for example, should be administered separately between the two groups.
Previously employers may have avoided training non-employees altogether, but Wajert advised against this since companies can still be held accountable for the actions of their independent contractors.
Drafting the same employment contracts to use for employees and gig economy workers is also inadvisable. “You really need to have those distinctions. It's really important.” Wajert said.
Rubin pointed to the potential of the gig economy with regards to the legal industry, citing a CLIO study that shows small law firms achieving an average of 2.4 billable hours per day. The rest of their time is devoted to administrative work or marketing and collections.
Being able to farm some of that work out to independent contractors could free time for more lucrative activities. “That kind of model I think will increasingly touch lots of clients and industries,” Rubin said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1GOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
- 2Houston-Based Law Firm Overcomes Defamation Suit for Website Warning
- 3The Time Is Now for Employers to Assess Risk of Employees’ Use of DeepSeek
- 4Big Law Partner Co-Launches Startup Aiming to Transform Fund Formation Process
- 5How the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250