Esquire Bets on Remote Work to Address Court Reporting Shortage
Esquire Deposition Solutions will allow its court reporters to remotely transcribe and process depositions from any of its U.S. offices, and is even looking at allowing them to work from home in the future.
March 06, 2019 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
Atlanta-based Esquire Deposition Solutions launched a new service last month allowing its court reporters to remotely transcribe and process depositions. Certified stenographers who have been trained in remote court reporting by Esquire and work in one of the company's 35 U.S. offices can now use cameras to remotely swear in witnesses, mark exhibits, perform read backs and create certified transcripts.
Esquire general counsel Avi Stadler said that the court reporters use Zoom Room and other video conference equipment when working remotely. He added that since some jurisdictions, such as Florida and Texas, prohibit remote court reporters, Esquire won't offer its new service in those states.
For the jurisdictions that do allow telecommuting court reporters, court reporters will have shorter commutes and the ability to process various depositions a day, depending on the matter's length and complexity, Stradler said.
“Every deposition is different,” he noted. “It's a good solution for more simple depositions that are a few hours in length.” He added that a court reporter shortage in some regions can be alleviated by telecommuting.
Court reporter jobs are expected to grow three percent from 2016 to 2026, slower than the seven percent expected average for all occupations, according the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Thirty-four percent of court reporters work in state government, while 31 percent work in business support services and 26 percent are employed in local government.
Based on a 2014 report sponsored by the National Court Reporters Association that was included in Esquire's recent press announcement, greater demand for court reporters is influenced by a strong economy and less tort reform. The report forecasts that the 2018 demand for court reporting would outpace the amount of court reporters available.
National Court Reporters Association president Sue Terry said she thought Esquire's new offering could be beneficial. “Just on the surface, if they are employing a court reporter that has a low level of work available and there's reporters available, of course I think that's a good solution.” Terry added that remote court reporting is new but growing in the industry.
Indeed, the court reporting industry is slowly being transformed by disruptive technology and new legal tech startups. Cloud-based app DirectDep, for instance, launched in 2017 to allow legal professionals to more easily schedule and reserve court reporters and stenographers.
The profession has also experienced consolidation. Last year, Veritext Legal Solutions acquired court reporter company David Feldman World.
As the industry braces for a possible ongoing shortage in court reporters, Esquire GC Stadler said his company aims to continue to leverage technology to create more ease for court reporters.
“I am hopeful as we roll this product out and it becomes more popular, we can offer more solutions,” Stadler said, adding that the company is looking at allowing court reporters to work remotely from anywhere, even their homes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 2Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 3Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 4Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 5'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250