For Startup GCs, It's Fun and Chaos in Fast-Evolving Role
At a session at the Columbia Legal Tech Fair 2019, in-house legal professionals discussed the particular challenges that come with being the legal manager at nascent companies.
March 11, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
Many in the legal industry know that the roles attorneys have to play at law firms and legal departments can be worlds apart. For Wayne Chang, senior director and deputy GC at Zocdoc, the difference between the two is one of pace and order.
“Being in-house is in large part managing chaos… which is you get thrown anything and everything and you are expected to have an answer. Whereas in the law firm that is not necessarily the case—there is a safety net, you're working with lawyers,” he explained
But to be sure, Chang's experience isn't exactly the norm. Sure, he worked on corporate legal matters, but he did so at a startup, which he noted has its own particular brand of “chaos.”
At the Columbia Legal Tech Fair 2019, hosted by Columbia Law School's Legal Tech Association on March 8, in-house legal professionals discussed the nuances of the startup GC's life. Suffice it to say, a lot revolved around the need to be flexible and work independently in the face of an unpredictable and fast-paced role.
While startups can be some of the most technologically advanced companies in the economy, their legal departments may be anything but. For Sarah Feingold, general counsel at Vroom.com, co-founder at The Fourth Floor and a former senior counsel at Etsy, working at startups means learning to work without depending on knowledge resources.
“When you're at a firm, you can bounce things off other lawyers and figure things out,” she explained. “When you're at a startup, you have nothing. You don't even have LexisNexis or WestLaw—you have Google, guys.”
But even though GCs at startups may have little in the way of research tools, they are required to give quick answers to complex legal questions. In fact, their ability to do can be a matter of business survival. “Especially with early stage startups, if you move slow, the company isn't going to be around for much longer,” Feingold said.
Since GCs at startups are usually the sole in-house lawyer at the office, the issues they handle can span the spectrum of legal and business matters, and can also change at an incredible pace. Zocdoc's Chang noted that though he was initially handling high-velocity contracting work at his company, his role “very quickly pivoted, not by my own volition, but because there was a need to do it… I quickly took on a product advisory role.”
He added, “You have to keep learning because your job just keeps changing. My job changed one week into starting.”
In addition to changing responsibilities, GCs at startups must also be able to adapt to a fast changing C-suite and workforce as well. “You can have a boss one day and another the next day… you have to be willing to go with the flow,” Feingold noted.
Of course, the challenges GCs face at startups can be pronounced if they are the only counsel at the company. But once they start building out their teams, things can get a little more manageable. “I was at Etsy all by myself for five years, which was a mistake,” Feingold said. “I hired someone, and what happens is your role becomes a narrower and a little deeper,” and you can specialize on practice areas you enjoy.
But ultimately, working in-house at a start-up can be far more exciting than working at a law firm. As Chang said, “'Fun' and 'work' weren't in my vernacular until I went in-house.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
- 2State Budget Proposal Includes More Money for Courts—for Now
- 3$5 Million Settlement Reached With Stone Academy
- 4$15K Family Vacation Turned 'Colossal Nightmare': Lawsuit Filed Against Vail Ski Resorts
- 5Prepare Your Entries! The California Legal Awards Have a New, February Deadline
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250