Why Legal Operations Matters and How to Optimize Its Impact
Legal operations managers optimize the larger legal supply chain matching up a portfolio of supply to the company's portfolio of legal needs to meet strategic business objectives.
March 11, 2019 at 01:55 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The legal operations manager is a cross-functional role responsible for leveraging the investments made by the legal department. The role requires a wide-ranging skill set encompassing strategic planning, financial management, vendor management, technology management and legal data analytics. Legal operations managers help legal departments get the most out of their budgets, vendors and technology. They optimize the larger legal supply chain matching up a portfolio of supply (e.g., law firms, alternative service providers, consultants and in-house teams) to the company's portfolio of legal needs to meet strategic business objectives.
According to the 2018 Chief Legal Officer Survey, 73 percent of organizations cite hiring an administrator or legal ops manager as the most significant factor in driving legal department efficiency. By employing a results-driven approach to their work and continually prioritizing objective data over subjective hunches, legal ops professionals can have a huge financial impact. In fact, Cisco indicates that its legal ops team has saved the company a whopping $400 million over the past few years.
|CLOC's Core Competencies Shape Legal Operations
Since its inception, the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) has served as an invaluable resource for the legal ops industry. The group has identified 12 key areas on which legal ops professionals should focus their efforts, including financial management, vendor management, cross-functional alignment, technology and process support, service delivery and alternative support models, organizational design, support and management, communications, data analytics, litigation support and IP management, knowledge management, information governance and records management, and strategic planning.
CLOC also stresses the importance of legal ops professionals setting a distinct operational strategy for their legal departments. This can include automating and optimizing workflows, creating a clear technology road map, implementing relevant technologies and processes to save time and money (such as machine learning or cloud-based e-billing software), and maximizing departmental resources by tracking and managing external and internal spend to deliver the best value.
|Four Best Practices for Long-Term Legal Operations Success
More specifically, there are tactical strategies legal teams (and their organizations) can incorporate to better support both new and existing legal ops teams. Consider implementing these four best practices to ensure long-term success for your legal ops efforts:
Establish a change management plan. For organizations introducing a new legal ops role or department for the first time, it's crucial to remember that people are inherently resistant to change. To overcome this obstacle, take the time to make sure everyone understands how the new role (or department) will work within the existing legal department. Create a cohesive vision for how legal ops will drive operational excellence for the legal department and other key stakeholders in the organization through more streamlined and standardized processes, new technologies and cross-functional collaboration.
Set clear expectations. Whether legal ops is a new, expanded or existing function, it's important to continually manage the expectations of both the legal department and the rest of the organization to ensure acceptance and ongoing support. Share clear efficiency outcomes to help disseminate the value of legal ops, rather than simply creating more bureaucracy, processes, rules, dashboards and the like.
Build a future-proof technology road map. There are many existing technologies that legal ops teams can leverage to optimize operational processes and gain greater transparency into current workflows. However maintaining and planning for future scenarios is just as important as implementing the latest technology and tools. To outline such a plan, consider how legal ops is defined, what standards will measure the department's maturity and how cost optimization will affect legal ops tactics. It's also important to consider legal ops' relationship with IT and adhere to relevant best practices to ensure the two teams work symbiotically to support technology road maps. Lastly, work to institutionalize any new technologies or best practices for future hires by incorporating them into training processes.
Engage in transparent pricing with outside counsel. Critical to the success of any legal ops department is acknowledging that the traditional model of relying on outside counsel to determine fee structures no longer aligns with legal operations' focus to manage costs and achieve spend predictability. Control costs by leveraging outside counsel billing guidelines to reduce billing errors and overhead charges, flat fee or alternative fee arrangements, and/or standard negotiation processes that can reduce friction.
|Transparency and Empowerment Are Key
Legal ops is, and will continue to be, a fundamental component of any successful legal department. Whether you're hiring your first legal ops manager, expanding an established legal ops team or looking for new ways to make your existing department more efficient, remember that the success of legal ops depends on the willingness and support of everyone involved. Prioritize transparency above all else by continually communicating the goals and results of your legal ops department with the rest of your organization, and empower your legal ops professionals to incorporate any technologies and processes that best support their data-driven mandate. In doing so, any legal department—no matter its size or industry—can benefit from greater financial and operational efficiencies, as well as more informed and strategic decision-making.
Nathan Wenzel is the CEO and co-founder of SimpleLegal, which he launched with CTO Patrik Outericky. He brings more than 20 years of experience in business intelligence and analytic applications, as well as driving business success and growth. As CEO, Wenzel leads company strategy, product direction and adoption.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court of Georgia Disbars 1, Reinstates 1
- 2New York City’s Failure to Pay Its Bills Is Putting Vulnerable New Yorkers in the Crosshairs
- 3Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
- 4Justice on the Move: The Impact of 'Bristol-Myers Squibb' on FLSA Forum-Shopping
- 5Wachtell Helps Miami Dolphins Secure One of NFL’s First Private Equity Deals
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250