Get a Seat at the Table with Data-Driven Decision Making
It's extremely important that your legal department can trust the data that it's working with, and that it is secure, yet accessible. The deeper challenge is to build a data-driven approach and sensibility into the day-to-day workflow of your legal department.
March 12, 2019 at 07:00 AM
6 minute read
Step into any corporate boardroom during an annual review, and when the talk turns to legal spend, you are certain to hear some talk about reducing costs and improving efficiency. Unfortunately, too often that's as far as the discussion goes. But new data-driven approaches are turning good intentions to make better business decisions into reality.
Corporate legal departments are well aware that poor decision making around law firms, timekeepers and billing guidelines can have a real impact on a company's bottom line. Those decisions can affect the viability of the whole company. That's why you see more and more legal departments investing in legal spend management solutions, and relying on analytics and insights from their own spend data to inform decision-making around billing guidelines, law firm choices, case outcomes and more.
Because Gut Instincts Aren't Enough
Imagine a world where engineers build bridges a certain way because “it just feels right,” or doctors prescribe a course of treatment based on a hunch. There would be a huge outcry, and rightly so, and it's very much the same in a legal department.
In this setting, decisions are based upon a combination of many things. Instinct may be part of it, but a firm's reputation, industry expertise, and standing in the community all play a role as well. Lastly, analytics can be elemental in making decisions.
Thanks to the combination of cloud computing and big data at the heart of the digital economy, a wealth of data is being generated every single day. It's just waiting there to be gathered, stored, accessed and analyzed to inform decision-making. According to an article on Law.com, “the global legal analytics market will grow at a compound annual growth rate of over 32 percent, in value terms, between 2017 and 2022.”
What good data delivers is the ability to turn gray areas of uncertainty into black and white facts. It takes away the guesswork and replaces it with concrete evidence. By using reliable data in conjunction with years of experience and a clear-eyed strategy, you put yourself in a strong position to build compelling arguments, no matter the subject matter.
This not only applies to legal arguments, but also to the more day-to-day areas of running a corporate legal department. Labor costs, easy billing, time management, and other daily management and productivity issues can be overwhelming and can create a strong, downward spiral if those decisions are not informed by the data.
Data-Driven Decision Making is Fact-Driven Decision Making
No other profession relies more on the simple, persuasive power of a fact than the law. Something is either wrong or it is right, fact or opinion, legal or illegal. However, not all legal departments leverage data in their decision-making processes.
“If you go back a few years, a lot of decisions were made on relationships based on individuals within a corporate law department who perhaps have alliances to their previous law firm,” explains Doug Ventola, managing director of legal consultancy Consilio to Law.com. “Now, we've seen a dramatic increase in the way analytics is being adopted, allowing companies to make selections based on real data.”
The tide has turned and there's no going back. The kinds of questions that can be answered by data include:
- What am I spending my money on and with whom?
- How well am I spending money with outside legal counsel?
- What law firms are performing (by case type, jurisdiction, timekeeper)?
- Where can we improve?
- What is our success rate in a particular case type, jurisdiction and more?
- How do my rates compare to that of others in my industry?
The answers to these questions should inform your strategy going forward, and can lead to a real improvement in company workflow, reliability and profitability. But it does require a buy-in from everyone in the company. Data and the insights it offers needs to become part of your company's DNA.
Building A Data-Driven Culture In Your Company
It's extremely important that your legal department can trust the data that it's working with, and that it is secure, yet accessible. The deeper challenge is to build a data-driven approach and sensibility into the day-to-day workflow of your firm.
Start small: Begin by incorporating data into relatively minor decisions that don't have profound implications if they go wrong. Areas like matter-management and billing are good areas to start with. These will help build data-driven thinking into the workforce, and will ensure that staff are on board with the changes, and see the value in it.
Manage the Data: It's vital to have an overview of how the data that you work with is gathered, where it is stored, and how it is managed. The goal should be to move all your data from spreadsheets, which are stored all over the place into one secure and shareable system that has the right permissions in place for the employees and vendors.
Data Health: Ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of your data is vital. Lawyers can't be expected to do it all themselves. Try to work with data professionals who are experienced and can set up systems that gather, store and deliver data effectively.
Strive for Actionable Intelligence: Your ultimate goal should be to provide information that can be acted upon. The data is not just there for data's sake, it's there to drive great decision-making.
One Size Does Not Fit All: If it's not being used, then it has no value. Because every legal department is different, you should choose a partner whose software and services can be customized to meet your needs.
Naturally, intuition and gut instinct will always have a role to play. Lawyers build up expertise and relationships, and they get a feel for an issue. They need to be able to rely on their instincts in order to “think outside the box.” But data and intuition are not mutually exclusive. When you can take advantage of legal spend analysis that combine years of expertise with sophisticated data systems, then that is a very powerful combination that will have a profound effect on the way that you do business in the years to come.
Michael Sheridan is an attorney and former EVP and General Counsel for Ceridian and its subsidiaries Comdata and Stored Value Systems, Inc. (SVS). He currently serves as President of Quovant, a Nashville-based software and services company providing legal spend management and data analytics solutions to some of the world's most recognized brands.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1US Law Firm Leasing Up Nearly 30% Through Q3, With a Growing Number of Firms Staying in Place
- 2SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
- 3Musk Avoids Sanctions for Skipping SEC Testimony for Rocket Launch
- 4On Advice of DOJ Office, Special Counsel Moves to End Trump Prosecution
- 5Stars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250