The New Mobile? Augmented and Virtual Reality Tech Ready for Its Moment
A new report from Perkins Coie and the XR Association found optimism from the technology industry about AR and VR's investment and market growth.
March 18, 2019 at 01:30 PM
5 minute read
In six years, augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies will be as ubiquitous as mobile devices in the consumer market. Seem impossible? Well, more than 80 percent of respondents in a recent Perkins Coie and XR Association survey disagree.
The “2019 Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Survey” found that AR and VR technologies are on the rise, both in terms of investment and market growth. Two hundred respondents were polled in the survey, of which 68 percent were executives in an established technology company and an additional 18 percent were founders or executives of start-up AR or VR companies.
The survey found that 39 percent strongly agreed with the statement that AR and VR technologies will be as ubiquitous as mobile devices, while 47 agreed. Only seven percent of respondents disagreed.
Right now, the gaming industry looks to be the primary area of growth for these technologies—61 percent of respondents picked it as one of the three industries where AR/VR is most applicable at this time, while 54 percent saw it as an area of highest investment. Much of the focus seems to be in North America as well, with 62 percent saying the region holds the most investment promise for AR/VR technologies.
None of this was particularly surprising, said Kirk Soderquist, who worked on the report and is co-chair of Perkins Coie's Interactive Entertainment practice. However, he did note how the survey showed AR and VR's growth outside of gaming: “There is a lot of talk and apparent attention around the application of AR/VR for workforce application, healthcare, eCommerce, etc., and the survey is some empirical evidence of what we are observing in the marketplace.”
He also added that if anything surprised him in the survey, it was the level of increased investment activity, particularly in later funding rounds. Total investment in the space grew from more than $2.5 billion in 2017 to $3.8 billion in 2018, according to the survey, and although there were fewer investment deals overall, 14 percent of deals in both the North America and APAC regions were for more than $100 million.
“This is both good news because it looked like investment in past years was slowing and concentrated on a few bigger players, and the investment in later rounds means the industry and technology is maturing,” Soderquist explained.
These technologies, though, do not come without legal risks. In 2019, 61 percent said that consumer privacy and data security were a primary legal risk with AR/VR technologies, up from 44 percent in last year's version of the survey. Soderquist pointed to new regulations like the GDPR and the CCPA as an impetus for many of these tech companies to beef up their privacy and security focus, adding that these aren't risks unique to AR and VR technologies.
“First, companies more and more appreciate that data is an important asset—no surprise there. Second, there is so much attention around privacy lately due to the need to comply with the GDPR and the upcoming CCPA. Every company with data and multi-jurisdictional reach are working toward GDPR compliance and CCPA compliance, and there will be more states to follow California. Third, there continue to be a number of data security issues in the news—again, across any number of industries,” he noted.
One area that not as many survey respondents were focused on, though, was intellectual property. Just 32 percent said difficulty in licensing technology and IP was a concern, while only 30 percent marked potential infringement of third-party owned IP as a concern. This was despite trademark and copyright disputes being noted as the most likely driver of disputes and litigation, at 56 percent of respondents.
But there are a couple of reasons for this disparity, in Soderquist's view. “First, the industry is still pretty young and I think folks are focused on development and not IP enforcement. Companies may be seeking IP protection but aren't really using it offensively yet. We may yet see more enforcement like we ultimately saw in the wireless space.”
“Second, maybe there is more collaboration,” he added. “A lot of companies are looking for, supporting, AR/VR adoption. It's more about finding ways to lift the entire industry, looking for ways to work across platforms, etc.”
Still, even with the legal risks, AR and VR technologies continue to proliferate. In 2019 and 2020, Soderquist explained, several major platform and device manufacturers are launching new products as the industry continues to explore and react to consumer needs.
“AR/VR is such an exciting industry because it's providing totally new experiences for consumers, and with that comes a natural period for consumers to learn more about the tech,” he added. “Most of the industry sees this as an opportunity, not a barrier.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Chinese Firms Hire Partners from Kirkland and Paul Hastings in Hong Kong
- 2'He Used Some Colorful Language': Yale Defamation Case Survives
- 3Man Charged in Daylong Shooting Rampage in Memphis Is Serving as His Own Lawyer
- 4Counterpoint: FLA Is Committed To the Success of Legal Professionals
- 5Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250