The New Mobile? Augmented and Virtual Reality Tech Ready for Its Moment
A new report from Perkins Coie and the XR Association found optimism from the technology industry about AR and VR's investment and market growth.
March 18, 2019 at 01:30 PM
5 minute read
|
In six years, augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies will be as ubiquitous as mobile devices in the consumer market. Seem impossible? Well, more than 80 percent of respondents in a recent Perkins Coie and XR Association survey disagree.
The “2019 Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Survey” found that AR and VR technologies are on the rise, both in terms of investment and market growth. Two hundred respondents were polled in the survey, of which 68 percent were executives in an established technology company and an additional 18 percent were founders or executives of start-up AR or VR companies.
The survey found that 39 percent strongly agreed with the statement that AR and VR technologies will be as ubiquitous as mobile devices, while 47 agreed. Only seven percent of respondents disagreed.
Right now, the gaming industry looks to be the primary area of growth for these technologies—61 percent of respondents picked it as one of the three industries where AR/VR is most applicable at this time, while 54 percent saw it as an area of highest investment. Much of the focus seems to be in North America as well, with 62 percent saying the region holds the most investment promise for AR/VR technologies.
None of this was particularly surprising, said Kirk Soderquist, who worked on the report and is co-chair of Perkins Coie's Interactive Entertainment practice. However, he did note how the survey showed AR and VR's growth outside of gaming: “There is a lot of talk and apparent attention around the application of AR/VR for workforce application, healthcare, eCommerce, etc., and the survey is some empirical evidence of what we are observing in the marketplace.”
He also added that if anything surprised him in the survey, it was the level of increased investment activity, particularly in later funding rounds. Total investment in the space grew from more than $2.5 billion in 2017 to $3.8 billion in 2018, according to the survey, and although there were fewer investment deals overall, 14 percent of deals in both the North America and APAC regions were for more than $100 million.
“This is both good news because it looked like investment in past years was slowing and concentrated on a few bigger players, and the investment in later rounds means the industry and technology is maturing,” Soderquist explained.
These technologies, though, do not come without legal risks. In 2019, 61 percent said that consumer privacy and data security were a primary legal risk with AR/VR technologies, up from 44 percent in last year's version of the survey. Soderquist pointed to new regulations like the GDPR and the CCPA as an impetus for many of these tech companies to beef up their privacy and security focus, adding that these aren't risks unique to AR and VR technologies.
“First, companies more and more appreciate that data is an important asset—no surprise there. Second, there is so much attention around privacy lately due to the need to comply with the GDPR and the upcoming CCPA. Every company with data and multi-jurisdictional reach are working toward GDPR compliance and CCPA compliance, and there will be more states to follow California. Third, there continue to be a number of data security issues in the news—again, across any number of industries,” he noted.
One area that not as many survey respondents were focused on, though, was intellectual property. Just 32 percent said difficulty in licensing technology and IP was a concern, while only 30 percent marked potential infringement of third-party owned IP as a concern. This was despite trademark and copyright disputes being noted as the most likely driver of disputes and litigation, at 56 percent of respondents.
But there are a couple of reasons for this disparity, in Soderquist's view. “First, the industry is still pretty young and I think folks are focused on development and not IP enforcement. Companies may be seeking IP protection but aren't really using it offensively yet. We may yet see more enforcement like we ultimately saw in the wireless space.”
“Second, maybe there is more collaboration,” he added. “A lot of companies are looking for, supporting, AR/VR adoption. It's more about finding ways to lift the entire industry, looking for ways to work across platforms, etc.”
Still, even with the legal risks, AR and VR technologies continue to proliferate. In 2019 and 2020, Soderquist explained, several major platform and device manufacturers are launching new products as the industry continues to explore and react to consumer needs.
“AR/VR is such an exciting industry because it's providing totally new experiences for consumers, and with that comes a natural period for consumers to learn more about the tech,” he added. “Most of the industry sees this as an opportunity, not a barrier.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250