Why Property Tech Might Be the Next Frontier For Legal
Investment in real estate technology is on the rise, and developers, landlords and other professionals are looking to their attorneys to help keep them abreast of the latest developments in the space.
March 18, 2019 at 09:33 AM
4 minute read
The three rules of real estate are location, location, location. But the fourth one just might be technology, especially for lawyers who are looking to remain or become the go-to resources for the growing number of clients taking an interest in property technology (“prop tech”).
For the uninitiated, “prop tech” is an umbrella term for the place where real estate and technology meet. Standing under that umbrella you might find everything from software that automates lease corrections to an app that instructs a tenant where he or she can find the pizza parlor closest to their new apartment building.
To be sure, such tech isn't just for attorneys. After some initial hesitation, developers, landlords and other real estate professionals are finally arriving at the technology party and would really like to help plan the next one, too.
“Our clients… are learning about and implementing more evolved technologies and as they do so want to get in on those technologies at the ground floor both to make sound investments but also to better the real estate experience at an earlier stage,” said Benjamin Hittman, an associate at Goodwin Procter.
Goodwin launched a prop tech practice last fall after noticing a substantial amount of cross-utilization between its technology and traditional real estate practices. The firm's website includes statistics taken from CRETech that show global venture capital investment in real estate technology growing from $1.8 billion in 2015 to 11.2 billion in 2018.
So why is prop tech suddenly so hot? Blake Liggio, a partner in Goodwin's Real Estate Industry Group, think that it's due in part to the accelerated development of technological assets geared toward innovations in real estate.
“It's sort of this last frontier from a technological perspective from an industry that obviously is the largest industry on the planet, and so I think its just a spot where venture capital sees a lot of growth in the next several years,” Liggio said.
Better development could help to drive adoption of prop tech inside law firms too. Gabriel Safar practiced as a commercial real estate attorney before co-founding LeasePilot, the company behind the lease-drafting solution of the same name.
He thinks that many real estate tools aren't designed with lawyers in mind. “Most technology is created by engineers and people that have an understanding of some big benefit or the generic concept of efficiency. But the tools that are being created actually make the end-user's life harder,” Safar said.
That doesn't mean that law firms won't continue to try and incorporate prop tech, though. Giving up isn't exactly an option. Safar pointed to an increasingly crowded marketplace and the desire—or need—for a competitive edge as drivers that make both law firms and real estate companies more willing to look to the future.
Pressure from clients doesn't hurt, either. “[Clients] want stuff done fast, and they can't understand why lawyers can't do it faster. They don't realize that lawyers are using a cell phone from 1993, and they think that lawyers are using an iPhone. There's this fundamental disconnect,” Safar said.
In this case the “iPhone” is automation software that can make key changes inside a 100-page lease while potentially cutting down on errors. Still, lawyers aren't just going to get away with delivering faster leases.
Clients who approach the prop tech team at Goodwin are looking for a more holistic understanding of how technology can be a boon to their business. For instance, a landlord who wants to distinguish his apartment complex from all of the others on the market might inquire about tech that can be used to enhance the tenant experience, like an app that lists all of the nearby restaurants or attractions.
There are also tools that can directly impact the bottom line by measuring key variables inside a property such as energy efficiency. Hittman said that because real estate can be a very narrow industry, those clients look to them to gauge what's available and what's just around the corner in the world of tech.
“There's a lot of real estate investors and developers who are looking to do whatever they can to get ahead of it,” Hittman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250