Authenticity of Leaked Docuseries Audio at the Center of Meek Mill Case
U.S. District Judge Gerald McHugh of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania last week issued an order asking the parties to either agree on an expert to evaluate the audio tape or submit names of qualified experts who could review the tape for authenticity.
March 19, 2019 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
The federal judge overseeing the dispute between Roc Nation, a subsidiary of retail giant Amazon, and a prominent Philadelphia attorney that stemmed from the filming of a documentary series about the rapper Meek Mill has asked the parties to have an expert review the allegedly leaked audio recording that is at the center of the controversy.
U.S. District Judge Gerald McHugh of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania last week issued an order asking the parties to either agree on an expert to evaluate the audio tape or submit names of qualified experts who could review the tape for authenticity.
“Following review of the expert's analysis, the court will consider granting leave to the parties for any supplemental submissions that may be relevant,” McHugh said.
The audio tape is central to claims that Philadelphia attorney A. Charles Peruto Jr. brought last year against Amazon Studios, Roc Nation and others for allegedly violating the Wiretap Act when he was recorded, allegedly without his knowledge, during the filing of the docuseries about Mill and the justice system.
On the audio, which was eventually leaked to The Philadelphia Inquirer, Peruto can be heard saying, among other things, that the conduct of his client, Philadelphia Judge Genece Brinkley, who oversaw high-profile criminal proceedings against Mill, “looks fucking awful.”
According to Peruto, a portion of the audio was cut out of the leaked recording, which would have given the proper context to his comments, in which he said he praised the judge for following the law. He also said he made the comments off the record, and when he believed the camera had been turned off.
The defendants have asked the court to dismiss the claims, contending, among other things, that Peruto never said the conversation should be off the record, and that under the federal Wiretap Act, only consent from one of the parties is needed.
“Simply put, because the recording itself and the subsequent dissemination of the recording were lawful, Peruto cannot state a federal Wiretap Act claim against any of the defendants as a matter of law,” the defendants said in a joint motion.
The docuseries, which is set to be released on Amazon's streaming service over the summer, focuses on the criminal proceedings against Mill, whose real name is Robert Williams, and the numerous criminal justice issues that arose out of his case.
Mill's case caught national attention in late 2017 after Brinkley sentenced the hip-hop star to a lengthy jail sentence for a probation violation, even though neither Mill's probation officer nor the prosecutor on the case had sought jail time.
The sentence garnered national attention and sparked an outcry for criminal justice reforms. It also led to a protracted appeals process, which has spurred hundreds of additional appeals involving cases from Mill's arresting officer, led one court employee to be fired, and raised an ethical cloud over Brinkley, which eventually led her to hire Peruto.
A teaser trailer for the docuseries was posted Sunday.
Ballard Spahr attorney Michael Berry is representing Amazon, and Joshua Peles of Reed Smith is representing Roc Nation. Neither attorney immediately returned a call for comment. Jim Beasley Jr. of The Beasley Firm, who is representing Peruto, declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250