Stop, Drop, and Think: A Futurist's Plea for Caution in the Age of AI
Amy Webb's book <i>The Big Nine</i> raises and attempts to answer the most profound questions posed by AI. Tod Northman and Elisabeth Arko of Tucker Ellis provide a review of the book's strengths and weaknesses.
March 20, 2019 at 09:30 AM
7 minute read
Artificial intelligence (AI) represents the third age of computing development. But, according to Amy Webb, AI's subtlety makes it insidious. Released in early March, Webb's book The Big Nine: How the Tech Titans & Their Thinking Machines Could Warp Humanity raises and attempts to answer the most profound questions posed by AI. Webb warns of a dark future if we fail to reckon with the social, political, and economic changes resulting from AI, as well as China's determination to establish preeminence in it.
Webb has poured a lifetime of researching, writing, and conversing—in a word, thinking—into her masterwork. The Acknowledgements section, where she describes her mentors, conversation partners, and sundry other sources, reveals the breadth of her connections: She has worked for industry; consulted with military and intelligence sources; lived and studied in the United States, Japan, and China; taught at New York University's Stern School of Business; and lectured widely. But it is her curiosity and courage to face hard problems that distinguishes her work from the growing stack of other books analyzing AI.
Webb is a first-rate storyteller. From her debut book, Data, A Love Story: How I Cracked the Online Dating Code to Meet My Match, Webb has demonstrated engaging humor and erudition. She is self-effacing, but there is no doubting her technical chops. The detail throughout the book is impressive, but not overwhelming. Her TedSalon talk “How I hacked online dating” is laugh-out-loud funny but bristles with intelligence and creativity; those same strengths elevate The Big Nine.
Webb proves herself a first-rate futurist, which her book prior to this one The Signals Are Talking had suggested. Both a professor of strategic foresight at NYU's Stern School of Business and the founder of the Future Today Institute, a “leading foresight and strategy firm that helps leaders and their organizations prepare for complex futures,” Webb describes the history and development of futurist forecasting In The Big Nine.
Webb attempts to navigate between popular science and deep science. To tell her story, she needs her lay readers to understand AI; however, since the goal of the book is to describe the risks of ungoverned AI and to provoke policy makers to take action, Webb must also engage already well-informed readers, to convince them of the importance of AI and the dangers and perils that await us all if the problem is ignored.
Therein lies one of the principal shortcomings of the book. Readers with only marginal familiarity with the state of AI development will benefit significantly from the first of the three parts of the book. Part I thoroughly analyzes the history of AI. Webb artful selects examples to orient her readers with a limited understanding of AI and allow them to sufficiently comprehend the foundational elements of her argument. For the reader with a modest command of AI and high tech, the section is well-written, but it provides little new information. The discussion of the “Big Nine”—nine large tech companies that, according to Webb, control the development of AI—follow a similar roadmap. For those who don't follow business news, this section provides background on the entrenched corporations and academic institutions that “rule” AI. In focusing on the six American companies: Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, IBM, and Microsoft (the “G-MAFIA”), Webb competently summarizes the familiar news stories that have inundated the tech media coverage for the past few years, yet the section takes no further steps to uncover a nuanced perspective of these stories. As such, this section provides little to those readers with even a modest background in business news.
The three Chinese tech titans Aliaba, Baidu, and Tencent are less known to American readers, and Webb details their efforts engagingly. She weaves information about China's government support for AI throughout the stories, which is critical to her thesis.
Background accomplished, in Part II of the book Webb uses her skills as a futurist to chart three “plausible futures over the next 50 years.” The three scenarios “range from optimistic to pragmatic to catastrophic.” She intends to reveal the opportunity—and the risk—as we move toward artificial superintelligence. Webb uses the approach developed by Herman Kahn, a 1950s futurist at RAND Corporation who studied nuclear warfare, whereby she provides a range of plausible scenarios that might occur in the next 50 years. In the optimistic scenario, we make vast changes by injecting humanity into AI. This is done by adopting a strategy to direct and control AI's progress. The world she envisions looks similar to our world now, but with more helpful computers. In the pragmatic scenario, we make minor tweaks to AI's development track. As a result, we continue to minimize or ignore the looming risk from China's plans. In her pessimistic scenario, we do nothing to change our current course. From this, superintelligence (that is, AI much more apt than humans and constantly improving) develops unchecked, and China eventually and irredeemably rules the world. We note this section resembles a Sino-themed dystopian novel.
In Part III of the book, Webb lays out her vision for how we might ameliorate the adverse effects of AI (particularly as it becomes increasingly sophisticated) and counter China's ambitions for global dominance. Her suggestions, such as creating a Global Alliance on Intelligence Augmentation, treating AI as a public good, and changing the structure of western governments, are not objectionable, but without some compelling outside force, they seem unlikely to muster political support. Webb likewise expresses a desire for the Big Nine to change their AI businesses by intentionally being more inclusive and ethical and asking themselves if their plans are likely to turn out well in the long term. She acknowledges that the Big Nine mean well, but are prisoners to their own myopia. Webb urges the reader to take action to influence governments and the Big Nine to address AI's and China's hazards. Given the artful sketching of the problem, the “solution” comes off as naïve.
A more specific problem with the book is Webb's argument about the short-termism of publicly traded tech companies. Citing anecdotes from the G-MAFIA's acquisition history, Webb asserts that the orientation toward profit predominates and prevents long-term planning. While this assertion conforms to conventional wisdom, in fact Amazon, Google and Apple are famously long-term oriented. All three are so awash in cash that they can make huge investments in AI, and their research and development budgets are rounding errors in their financial statements. By contrast, United States government programs, which are far more subject to our every two-year election cycles, are Webb's panacea.
Another challenge to Webb's thesis appears in the news. China's Huawei reportedly has the second-highest AI development budget and is even more closely aligned with China's government, yet does not make the Big Nine. Webb may be right that her nine are larger and more important, but the presence of a strong challenger such as Huawei challenges Webb's thesis of the Big Nine's hegemony.
The best answer, ultimately, may be to model ourselves after Webb. As she urges throughout the narrative, we must be mindful of the effects of AI—particularly as its power increases and its uses proliferate both in ways observed and ways subtle. We must stop to notice, drop onto a comfortable couch, and think.
Tod Northman, a partner at Tucker Ellis LLP, has 25 years of experience in business and corporate law, focusing in particular on aviation, business transactions, commercial law, autonomous vehicle and artificial intelligence technology, and mergers and acquisitions. He is a co-founder of the firm's emerging technology and autonomous vehicle groups. Elisabeth Arko, an associate at Tucker Ellis LLP, has experience in complex civil litigation focusing in particular on products liability, toxic tort, medical malpractice, blockchain technology, and smart contracts. She is a co-founder of the firm's emerging technology and blockchain groups.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250