Relativity Debuts RelativityOne Mobile App for Review On The Go
The app, currently for Apple mobile devices, allows RelativityOne users to access their workspaces and case documents, tag relevant documents, and sync their work with their larger review team from mobile devices.
March 21, 2019 at 01:00 PM
3 minute read
RelativityOne already introduced a shift in the e-discovery process when it transferred Relativity's e-discovery software to the cloud. Now, RelativityOne is set to undertake another shift: to mobile.
This week, Relativity introduced a new RelativityOne mobile app, designed to facilitate accessing and reviewing documents remotely. The app allows RelativityOne users to access their workspaces and case documents, tag relevant documents, and sync their work with their larger review team from mobile devices. The app also allows for push notifications from documents on the web for one-touch access as needed.
The app is free to download and is currently available on the Apple's app store by searching for RelativityOne. It is currently only available on Apple devices that utilize iOS, though concerning Android, Relativity said, “We're always looking at expanding our mobile offerings.”
Jim Witte, senior product manager at Relativity, told Legaltech News that the app is primarily intended to support RelativityOne's core review processes, such as searching, reviewing and coding. “Since RelativityOne is a robust platform, our goal was not to mimic RelativityOne in the mobile world,” he explained. “It was really designed to allow users to take the Review functionality wherever they go.”
And that flexibility is something Relativity says its users value highly. Witte noted how mobile devices are now ubiquitous, and giving the capability to review from mobile devices “has its own distinct advantages.”
“It's portable and can be done in the moment—having a discussion with a colleague about the merits of a case, while you're waiting for a plane, etc. It also works on an iPhone and iPad to support users on their device of choice. And like RelativityOne, it's built with security in mind and ensures that there are no important documents or review materials left behind on the train/plane,” he explained.
Relativity has been investing heavily in its RelativityOne cloud offering since it was announced in 2016. This January, the company announced pricing and subscription changes aimed at promoting the product and offering flexibility to customers and selling partners. RelativityOne was also a focus of the opening keynote of the company's Relativity Fest in October, where CEO Andrew Sieja noted that the product represents 11 percent of Relativity's under-contract revenue.
With that in mind, it's not surprising that Relativity is providing more options for RelativityOne users that take advantage of the cloud's flexibility. Witte noted that the company believes “this new mobile experience pairs well with the current user experience our RelativityOne customers enjoy today,” as the mobile app provides “the added speed, efficiency and flexibility that our SaaS product offers.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250