Remote Revolution: Law Schools Embracing Online Flexibility After Student Push
Law schools have been slow to adopt online coursework, but giving students the opportunity to pursue a degree in part online could free-up time to create valuable interpersonal relationships out in the real world.
March 21, 2019 at 09:30 AM
4 minute read
Last August, the American Bar Association updated its standards to allow up to 30 credits of distance education towards the juris doctor degree, meaning that students can work toward a law career while rarely setting foot on campus.
Unlike other academic disciplines, law schools have been slow to embrace online coursework. But doing so could open the door to new and diverse students who are able to attain more robust networking opportunities out in the real world.
“Law schools are going to have to move into this space because students have had the expectation at the undergraduate level that this is going to be an opportunity that is available to them,” said Carla Pratt, dean of the Washburn University School of Law in Topeka, Kansas.
|New Hampshire and the Hybrid JD
The traditional law school experience can be a stumbling block for more established professionals who have financial or familial responsibilities that prohibit them from relocating for school.
Those folks comprise the target demographic of the University of New Hampshire School of Law's hybrid JD program focusing specifically on intellectual property, technology and information law. Students still have to complete three-and-a-half-years of coursework, but they can do the vast majority of it online.
Megan Carpenter, dean of the UNH School of Law, thinks the program will allow the school to bring voices into the [virtual] classroom that wouldn't otherwise be there.
“So far we have applications from people in the financial services industry, the tech industry and applications from doctors. So it's sort of interesting, what an incredible classroom this is for people to bring a perspective to,” Carpenter said.
Still, law schools have to take care to ensure that the convenience of their respective programs didn't overshadow the interactive or experiential components that round out an education.
Carpenter thinks online classrooms actually augment the educational experience in some ways. She's able to offer guest speakers more flexibility since they can tune in remotely and real-time or group discussion boards ensure there's still ample student participation.
“So whereas if you're sitting in a classroom, you're kind of listening but you're checking out a little bit, online education really sort of requires students to be engaged and engages them with discussion questions and group work with their peers,” Carpenter said.
The end-goal is still all about getting out into the real world. UNH requires students to engage in a mock client setting or take on a residency at a law firm, government office or court for at least a semester.
|Washburn's Third Year Anywhere
Faculty at Washburn decided to restrict online courses to the third year because they wanted students to develop a core foundation of in-person and in-depth classroom learning first. Once they actually began to dive into structuring their online curriculum, it turned out that the differences are negligible.
“Everything that we currently that we do in-person, there's a way to do it online,” Pratt said.
To that end, Washburn recently announced its Third Year Anywhere program, where students entering their final year of law school can get a jump start on post-grad life by undertaking an externship in the city or geographic locale they plan on practicing in after graduation.
As the saying goes, one has to network to get work, which is great so long as the hiring partner at your dream firm regularly dines out at the campus dining hall.
“[Students] were a bit frustrated with the fact that they had difficulty accessing employers in the out-of-state markets where they intend to return home and practice in that market,” Pratt said.
Through the program, students can invest more heavily in their externships while still completing all of the necessary coursework online. Those interpersonal relationships can become critical post-graduation.
“Employers tell us that having a reference from someone in a local legal market means more to them than having a faculty reference,” Pratt said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250