Florida Firm Leveraging Automated Case Updates Becomes Latest Y Combinator Investment
The new Jet.Law firm deploys machine learning to forecast a case's workload and uses that prediction to price clients at a fixed monthly rate.
March 22, 2019 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
Florida-based Jet.Law and CaseGuide Inc. become the latest legal service providers to receive an investment from startup accelerator Y Combinator, with the company revealing it received $150,000 in exchange for a 7 percent stake in CaseGuide.
Jet.Law is a law firm that leverages technology created by tech company CaseGuide to predict a case's expected workload, information which is then is used to compute the client's fixed monthly bill.
Kyle Harris, an engineer and Jet.Law co-founder and CaseGuide CEO, noted the firm uses a “web scraper” to automatically email lawyers updates to court records concerning a client's matter. In turn, an email listing the updates is automatically created and sent to the client.
Automatic updates and automated emails are ways to keep clients aware of their legal matter's progression and prevent any “mystery bills” for clients, Harris noted.
“The nice thing about doing this our way is we get to have a law firm that has a different economic incentive than other law firms,” Harris said. “We are really motivated to make new tech and use what's out there to make the practice of law as efficient as possible.”
This efficiency is essential, as Jet.Law's sole attorney is Jet.law co-founder, CaseGuide CFO and former Jackson Lewis associate Jesse Unruh. Unruh said CaseGuide is concentrating on developing technology that will allow him to manage 20-30 cases on an ongoing basis as clients hire Jet.Law. He added that the firm will add attorneys as needed.
The firm's focus is defending small and midsize companies in employee litigation, a practice Unruh honed during a judicial clerkship and while working at other firms.
Last September, when Jet.Law and CaseGuide were only an idea shared by Unruh and Harris, they submitted an application for investment from Y Combinator. Harris said they were motivated not by Y Combinator's previous legal tech investments, but by what the accelerator wanted: good ideas, even from those without industry contacts.
By October, Harris and Unruh, and other startups, were invited to spend three months at Y Combinator's California office. During that time, which is described as a “Funding Cycle” by the company, startups are connected to potential investors and advisers, and participate in a Demo Day where they pitch their company.
In 2018, Legaltech News reported five legal-specific companies pitched their ideas at last March's Demo Day.
Harris and Unruh join a growing list of legal tech companies that are finding eager investors. For example, legal management software provider Onit received $200 million earlier this year from private investors. Law firms have also invested in legal tech solutions, with U.K. law firm Slaughter and May participating in a $10 million funding round for artificial intelligence-backed contract review platform Luminance.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
- 2NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
- 3Digging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
- 4Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 5Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250