Why VCs and Private Equity See Increasing Possibilities in Legal Tech
Investors are seeing opportunities in legal tech as lawyers have little choice but to address ongoing pain points that can only be solved through the application of tech solutions.
March 25, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
If you have some spare change laying around, legal tech seems like the place to put it these days. Earlier this month, legal contract AI company LinkSquares raised $4.8 million during its latest round of financing. In February, Amity Ventures and Village Global led a seed funding round that saw Evisort raise $4.5 million. Numerous other businesses have also seen an influx of cash that has led to a host of M&A activity.
So is this just a temporary fad or a trend in the making? The answer might be a little bit of both depending upon how confident investors are that lawyers are improving their traditionally tempestuous relationship with technology.
“I think the skepticism that they'll have is that lawyers have been bad customers of technology, and can [tech vendors] surmount that? … I think that's probably the biggest question that a venture person will have in almost any of these areas,” said Don Keller, a partner and member of the Technology Companies Group at Orrick.
Tyler Sosin, a partner at the venture capital firm Menlo Ventures, agreed that lawyers have been notoriously resistant to adopting new technologies. He views the increased interest in the legal tech market as part of a larger trend that sees cloud-based software seeping into departments or verticals that have traditionally been tougher to breach.
“More generally, just across the economy, you see that large banks and other institutions that never went to the cloud in the past are now more inclined to adopt it wholesale,” said Sosin.
It's an inclination rooted in a tremendous amount of necessity. Lawyers can encounter thousands of documents in the course of a single case, and technology such as artificial intelligence or cloud-based e-discovery tools can help cut straight to the most pertinent information with little cost.
A venture capitalist evaluating the situation from the outside might notice what Sosin referred to as a “tremendous amount of surface area,” or places where providers of technological solutions can insert their products to address pain points that can no longer be ignored.
That certainly played a significant role in Menlo's attraction to Everlaw. Last June, the firm led a Series B funding round that netted $25 million for the cloud-based e-discovery platform.
Sosin pointed out that the practice of e-discovery, for example, sits at the head of a much longer workflow, from the initial collection of documents all the way down to building files for deposition. There's plenty of room along the way for new innovations and solutions that can make the practice of law easier, meaning tech companies have space to grow and expand.
“I still think that a lot of software needs to be built. A lot of workflows, delightful workflows, can be built to make the lives of everyone in that [legal] ecosystem better,” Sosin said.
Mike Dalewitz, president and founder of Review Right, identified data privacy, information governance and data security as pain points tangentially related to the e-discovery space that are opening up new opportunities for investment in private equity.
“You've got private equity money coming because the returns on investment of e-discovery actually have been good from a private equity perspective. Very good, very quickly,” Dalewitz said.
Lately the e-discovery space has been a hub of consolidation and M&A activity. January alone saw HaystackID acquire eTERA Consulting and e-discovery company Omnivere brought into the fold of legal services provider Driven Inc.
Dalewitz expects to see a lot more consolidation in that space, particularly among companies worth $30 million and under. If that development comes to pass, it could bring some overall benefit to the marketplace.
“One thing again, with consolidation comes consistency and best practices,” Dalewitz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250