Why VCs and Private Equity See Increasing Possibilities in Legal Tech
Investors are seeing opportunities in legal tech as lawyers have little choice but to address ongoing pain points that can only be solved through the application of tech solutions.
March 25, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
If you have some spare change laying around, legal tech seems like the place to put it these days. Earlier this month, legal contract AI company LinkSquares raised $4.8 million during its latest round of financing. In February, Amity Ventures and Village Global led a seed funding round that saw Evisort raise $4.5 million. Numerous other businesses have also seen an influx of cash that has led to a host of M&A activity.
So is this just a temporary fad or a trend in the making? The answer might be a little bit of both depending upon how confident investors are that lawyers are improving their traditionally tempestuous relationship with technology.
“I think the skepticism that they'll have is that lawyers have been bad customers of technology, and can [tech vendors] surmount that? … I think that's probably the biggest question that a venture person will have in almost any of these areas,” said Don Keller, a partner and member of the Technology Companies Group at Orrick.
Tyler Sosin, a partner at the venture capital firm Menlo Ventures, agreed that lawyers have been notoriously resistant to adopting new technologies. He views the increased interest in the legal tech market as part of a larger trend that sees cloud-based software seeping into departments or verticals that have traditionally been tougher to breach.
“More generally, just across the economy, you see that large banks and other institutions that never went to the cloud in the past are now more inclined to adopt it wholesale,” said Sosin.
It's an inclination rooted in a tremendous amount of necessity. Lawyers can encounter thousands of documents in the course of a single case, and technology such as artificial intelligence or cloud-based e-discovery tools can help cut straight to the most pertinent information with little cost.
A venture capitalist evaluating the situation from the outside might notice what Sosin referred to as a “tremendous amount of surface area,” or places where providers of technological solutions can insert their products to address pain points that can no longer be ignored.
That certainly played a significant role in Menlo's attraction to Everlaw. Last June, the firm led a Series B funding round that netted $25 million for the cloud-based e-discovery platform.
Sosin pointed out that the practice of e-discovery, for example, sits at the head of a much longer workflow, from the initial collection of documents all the way down to building files for deposition. There's plenty of room along the way for new innovations and solutions that can make the practice of law easier, meaning tech companies have space to grow and expand.
“I still think that a lot of software needs to be built. A lot of workflows, delightful workflows, can be built to make the lives of everyone in that [legal] ecosystem better,” Sosin said.
Mike Dalewitz, president and founder of Review Right, identified data privacy, information governance and data security as pain points tangentially related to the e-discovery space that are opening up new opportunities for investment in private equity.
“You've got private equity money coming because the returns on investment of e-discovery actually have been good from a private equity perspective. Very good, very quickly,” Dalewitz said.
Lately the e-discovery space has been a hub of consolidation and M&A activity. January alone saw HaystackID acquire eTERA Consulting and e-discovery company Omnivere brought into the fold of legal services provider Driven Inc.
Dalewitz expects to see a lot more consolidation in that space, particularly among companies worth $30 million and under. If that development comes to pass, it could bring some overall benefit to the marketplace.
“One thing again, with consolidation comes consistency and best practices,” Dalewitz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250