Legal Tech Sees Opportunity in Corporate Law's Evolution
HighQ is releasing a new addition to its platform with tools that are specifically geared towards in-house counsel at a time when other legal tech providers are starting to recognize more corporate law teams as potential clients.
March 27, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
In-house legal departments have become an attractive target to legal tech companies as they look for ways to improve efficiency. And by turning to technology, corporate legal departments may be fundamentally altering the power balance between them and their outside counsel.
“It just feels like the early stages of something, where in-house teams are really stepping up and doing some really interesting things and really looking at technology and process improvement and efficiency in a very interesting way,” said Rob MacAdam, director of legal solutions at HighQ. The legal tech solutions provider has recently built an extension onto its existing platform featuring a suite of tools geared specifically towards corporate legal teams.
So why are in-house departments suddenly looking to invest in legal tech? The better question might be why not sooner. Even within an industry that has notoriously reluctant to adapt to new technologies, corporate legal teams might still be a step out of touch. Put another way, when new solutions do hit the marketplace, a company's first thought isn't always its legal department.
“[In-house departments] are in many cases kind of the forgotten team amongst their organization. They are used as problem solvers… They haven't necessarily had that same investment as other teams [with] technology,” MacAdam said.
But legal departments are realizing they need solutions to help streamline increasingly hefty workflows. To be sure, HighQ isn't the only solutions provider to take notice of a demographic ripe for legal tech. Carly Toward, a lawyer in charge of value propositions, market positioning and industry insights for corporate legal departments at Thomson Reuters, said her company has gradually increased its focus on in-house legal teams over the last five years.
The shift is due in equal parts to a surplus work that needs to be done within those departments and the right technology finally being in place to automate the completion of that work.
“There's a ton of manual process that exists within the legal department today and [with] departments bringing in technology managers to legal ops teams, they're certainly driving that interest as well,” Toward said.
Frank Giovinazzo, a managing director at InCloudCounsel, thinks that in-house teams are subject to more routine legal processes—summarizing or negotiating basic contracts, for example—than the average lawyer at a law firm. Those duties subtract from time that could be spent on more lucrative tasks.
“To monopolize their time with routine legal functions that can be outsourced really sacrifices an extremely valuable resource that they were hired to provide,” Giovinazzo said.
Establishing that value might also entail readjusting the power dynamic that exists between corporate counsel and their law firm counterparts. The new addition to HighQ's platform was built with the idea that while it enables collaboration with outside firms, in-house counsel remains entirely in control.
MacAdam said that a company could use the platform to evaluate the performance of different firms in its employ. If the time came to part ways, there wouldn't be any haggling over data or access to the system.
“I think that the other trend that we're seeing is in-house teams stepping up and actually wrestling away control from the law firms and saying, 'This is going to be on my terms and not yours,'” MacAdam said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Lawyers' Reenactment Footage Leads to $1.5M Settlement
- 2People in the News—Feb. 4, 2025—McGuireWoods, Barley Snyder
- 3Eighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
- 4Superior Court Re-examines Death of a Party Pending a Divorce Action
- 5Chicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250