FDA Alert on Hacking Vulnerability in Heart Defibrillators is Wake-Up Call
Corporate defense attorneys said internet-of-things privacy and security issues are a growing concern for medical device manufacturers, distributors and health care providers.
March 29, 2019 at 01:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
In a scenario that could have been swiped from a spy series like “Homeland,” the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a safety alert last week about the vulnerability to hacking of up to 750,000 implantable heart defibrillators used to correct life-threatening arrhythmias, raising novel considerations for in-house and outside counsel.
The March 21 alert warned health care providers and individuals using certain Medtronic implantable cardiac defibrillators of cybersecurity weaknesses in their wireless technology that could leave the devices exposed to hacking. The FDA said it had received no reports of patient harm related to the vulnerability.
The Minnesota-based company's telemetry protocol, which enables communication between the devices for patient monitoring and physician evaluation, doesn't use encryption, authorization or authentication, the FDA said. That could allow an unauthorized person to change the settings on the defibrillators or the home monitors or clinic programmers, according to the company's security bulletin. The issue “does not affect Medtronic pacemakers, insertable cardiac monitors or other Medtronic devices,” Medtronic said in a statement provided by a spokesman.
Medtronic said it is working with the FDA to fix the problem with security software updates, the first of which is expected later this year, subject to regulatory approvals, and that it is conducting security checks to look for unauthorized or unusual activity related to the issue. The FDA recommended that patients and physicians continue using the devices in the interim.
Corporate defense attorneys said internet-of-things privacy and security issues are a growing concern for medical device manufacturers, distributors and health care providers.
Jeffrey Rosenthal, a partner at Blank Rome in Philadelphia who specializes in privacy and consumer protection class action defense, said on Tuesday: “It is clear that Medtronic is working with the FDA and it seems like a very upfront discussion of the issues. …Getting out ahead of this as Medtronic appears to have done appears to be a reasonable approach.”
Rosenthal pointed out that California legislation, AB 1906 and SB 327, taking effect next year regulating the internet of things will require security and privacy in devices, as would legislation under consideration in both houses of Congress. “It is indicative of our time as this is becoming more and more prevalent an issue as IoT devices become more and more a part of our modern existence,” Rosenthal said.
Cozen O'Connor commercial litigation member John J. Sullivan in New York, meanwhile, said it is premature to speculate on possible lawsuits because no adverse events have been reported, but the issue around the security of internet-connected medical devices bears watching.
“It is hard to see a mass tort in this, but that doesn't mean there won't eventually be limited efforts by attorneys interested in bringing single claims or a few claims. I foresee a lot of viable defenses.” He said, ”while the claims themselves would be cutting-edge, the defenses would likely be more tried-and-true: causation, such as whether any hacking or alleged vulnerability of the device caused the injury; was there a legally cognizable defect; were proper warnings given; are the product liability claims preempted; are there cognizable damages?”
Sullivan continued: “Those are defenses we have seen in the past, and we would expect to see them again here. In the meantime, the companies have already been addressing this internally, and they are determining what kinds of steps need to be taken, which could include addressing warnings or instructions for use, so as to continue to address safety and prepare for any challenges.”
Last October, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a report stating that the FDA should put in place policies and procedures that better address cybersecurity risks to medical devices. In December, HHS, with the industry's help, put forward best practices in voluntary cybersecurity for the health care industry.
In the defibrillator safety alert issued last week, the FDA reminded “patients, patient caregivers, and health care providers that any medical device connected to a communications network (for example: Wi-Fi, public or home Internet) may have cybersecurity vulnerabilities that could be exploited by unauthorized users. However, the increased use of wireless technology and software in medical devices can also offer safer, more convenient, and timely health care delivery.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Does the Treasury Hack Underscore a Big Problem for the Private Sector?
- 2Gen AI Legal Tech Startup Eve Raises $47 Million Series A Investment
- 3Hicks Johnson Promotes Lori Arakaki and Daniel Scime to Firm Partnership
- 4Buchalter Opens in Chicago With 25 Lawyers, Staff
- 5Assessing the Second Trump Presidency’s Impact on College Sports
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250