Unbeknownst to Many, IoT Devices (And Their Cyber Risk) Are Everywhere
The number of internet of things devices inside organizations continues to grow, and with it so do the points of vulnerability for employees who may not give them a second thought.
April 03, 2019 at 11:45 AM
3 minute read
A 2018 study by the Ponemon Institute found that while 52 percent of organizations believe they have at least 1,000 internet of things (IoT) devices in-house, the actual study average weighed in at more than 15,000.
This begs the question: Are people really in the dark as to the number IoT devices in their lives—and does that pose a cyber security risk? The answer, in short, is yes and yes.
“I get the sense that IoT is on the forefront of people's minds, but I don't get the sense that they know the true extent to which there's these devices in their lives. I don't think they fully know all of the things that are operating around them,” said Linda Thayer, a partner at Finnegan.
Still, credit where credit is due—Thayer believes that most people are aware that their cell phones and computers can become infected by malware that can compromise sensitive data. But routine encounters with the other devices that form the backbone of a given workday may not raise the same red flags.
At a law firm, for example, Thayer said the second biggest vulnerability after phones and computers are wireless printers, which utilize encryption but could still be hacked and used to gain entrance to a network. Lawyers traveling on business aren't necessarily any safer in the outside world, either.
“They can get into a [connected] rental car and program in their phone and connect and talk while in a rental car. … You don't know what can be captured,” Thayer said.
This lack of awareness can be a significant security risk. “I think that there's going to be more and more hacks and bad results,” said Mark Radcliffe, a partner at DLA Piper. “And so as a practical matter, I think that what's going to happen is that over time people are going to become more sensitive to this. But I think it's going to take a while.”
Some of the risk the IoT poses can be boiled down to a lack of foresight. People either purchase IoT devices and neglect to update the default password to something more complex than “PASSWORD,” or connect existing machines to the internet without putting any cybersecurity measures in place.
Still, Thayer thinks that most entities, big or small, are moving in the direction of hiring full-time security managers to help mitigate risks. She noted that the practice is already common in the financial industry but is branching out into law firms as well.
The kinds of solutions those managers deploy could also face an upgrade should businesses gradually become more attuned to the risks posed by IoT devices. For Radcliffe, it all comes back to the basics. Management tools that help generate and retain complex passwords are a possibility.
“We may also shift to biometric security, which is going to be a lot more secure. That may happen and that may make it more effective, but right now I think it's a real mess,” Radcliffe said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Pro Hac Vice in Georgia: Rule Change for Nonresident Attorneys
- 2The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
- 3AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
- 4A Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
- 5‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250