Unbeknownst to Many, IoT Devices (And Their Cyber Risk) Are Everywhere
The number of internet of things devices inside organizations continues to grow, and with it so do the points of vulnerability for employees who may not give them a second thought.
April 03, 2019 at 11:45 AM
3 minute read
A 2018 study by the Ponemon Institute found that while 52 percent of organizations believe they have at least 1,000 internet of things (IoT) devices in-house, the actual study average weighed in at more than 15,000.
This begs the question: Are people really in the dark as to the number IoT devices in their lives—and does that pose a cyber security risk? The answer, in short, is yes and yes.
“I get the sense that IoT is on the forefront of people's minds, but I don't get the sense that they know the true extent to which there's these devices in their lives. I don't think they fully know all of the things that are operating around them,” said Linda Thayer, a partner at Finnegan.
Still, credit where credit is due—Thayer believes that most people are aware that their cell phones and computers can become infected by malware that can compromise sensitive data. But routine encounters with the other devices that form the backbone of a given workday may not raise the same red flags.
At a law firm, for example, Thayer said the second biggest vulnerability after phones and computers are wireless printers, which utilize encryption but could still be hacked and used to gain entrance to a network. Lawyers traveling on business aren't necessarily any safer in the outside world, either.
“They can get into a [connected] rental car and program in their phone and connect and talk while in a rental car. … You don't know what can be captured,” Thayer said.
This lack of awareness can be a significant security risk. “I think that there's going to be more and more hacks and bad results,” said Mark Radcliffe, a partner at DLA Piper. “And so as a practical matter, I think that what's going to happen is that over time people are going to become more sensitive to this. But I think it's going to take a while.”
Some of the risk the IoT poses can be boiled down to a lack of foresight. People either purchase IoT devices and neglect to update the default password to something more complex than “PASSWORD,” or connect existing machines to the internet without putting any cybersecurity measures in place.
Still, Thayer thinks that most entities, big or small, are moving in the direction of hiring full-time security managers to help mitigate risks. She noted that the practice is already common in the financial industry but is branching out into law firms as well.
The kinds of solutions those managers deploy could also face an upgrade should businesses gradually become more attuned to the risks posed by IoT devices. For Radcliffe, it all comes back to the basics. Management tools that help generate and retain complex passwords are a possibility.
“We may also shift to biometric security, which is going to be a lot more secure. That may happen and that may make it more effective, but right now I think it's a real mess,” Radcliffe said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250