Orrick Adds Another to the List of CCPA Compliance Tools
Orrick has made the latest contribution to the burgeoning landscape of tools meant to help companies struggling to navigate the California Consumer Protection Act and capitalize on compliance needs.
April 09, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Business leaders still struggling to wrap their heads around the forthcoming California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) just got tossed another tech-based lifeline, as law firm Orrick launched its CCPA Readiness Assessment Tool last week.
The tool prompts users to answer a series of questions meant to determine whether or not the law will even applies to them and the steps they'll need to take towards compliance if it does.
“We're hopeful that this tool helps to break it down and makes it easier to understand concepts and actually turn the law into an actionable compliance plan,” said Heather Egan Sussman, a partner at Orrick.
Turning a complicated thing simple is, well, complicated. For starters, the CCPA requires companies to be even more specific about the types of information they are collecting from consumers than the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Sussman, fellow Orrick partner Emily Tabatabai and their team had to pour over the “messy and dense” statute in order to generate the appropriate queries for the tool's questionnaire. Suffice to say, they sympathize with clients struggling to map out a suitable compliance strategy.
“The statute is not the best-written piece of legislation in the world,” Tabatabai said.
Users don't actually have to be Orrick clients in order to use the tool (not that they're turning people away at the door). But the firm is also deploying it as something of a first step, a way to help lawyers gauge exactly how far along the road towards compliance a business might be before dispensing of legal advice can begin.
On that subject: There's not actually a prescribed ratio of tech-to-human based advice a company can follow with regards to the CCPA. But according to Tabatabai, a multitude of tough and complex questions follows the initial slew offer by the compliance tool. These can include, how will complying with the CCPA impact a business' daily operational processes, and could it alter marketing or monetization strategies?
“There's still so much nuance in how the laws need to applied to a particular business that there's really just no technological substitute for high-level legal analysis and advice,” Tabatabai said.
Orrick isn't the only law firm to leverage tech against CCPA compliance. Parsons Behle Lab, a subsidiary of Parsons Behle & Latimer, released another question-based tool called CCPA IQ that pays close attention to the types of information that businesses are collecting from consumers in order to guide them towards a compliance strategy. Meanwhile, compliance companies like TrustArc have also begun adding new features to their platforms specifically geared towards CCPA compliance.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Understanding the HEMS Standard in Trusts
- 2Mergers Are About People, Not Paperwork: Here’s Why
- 3Wachtell Partner Leaves to Chair Latham's Liability Management Practice
- 4Morris Nichols Partners to Be Involved With PLI Program
- 5How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Cultivating a Culture of Mutual Trust Is Essential,' Says Gina Piazza of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250