'It's Credibility, Reliability, Follow Through': Senior In-House Tech Counsel Share Their Career Tips
Senior counsel from Twitter, Airbnb and other tech companies shared their paths to success and advice for new in-house lawyers on how to build trust, skills and relationships at companies at a panel in San Francisco.
April 11, 2019 at 01:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Senior in-house counsel from Twitter, Airbnb and other tech companies swapped legal career stories and lessons learned at a panel Wednesday morning.
Panelists at the event, hosted in San Francisco by local legal recruiting firm Kerwin Associates, stressed that for in-house counsel, the pathway to career fulfillment may not be as linear as their counterparts at firms.
“One of the biggest mistakes in-house lawyers often make is they think, 'Oh, now I'm in-house, there's this path, this trajectory I'll grow in. And unlike a law firm or maybe other professions, it's just not lock-step,” said Rafik Bawa, the deputy general counsel of product at Airbnb. “A hard realization is that you may have all the skills to be an effective leader and contributor in the organization, but there just isn't any role, there isn't that opening … it's a tough choice.”
Bawa and Sean Edgett, the vice president and general counsel of Twitter, suggested in-house counsel try growing laterally if promotions aren't open. Counsel can build skills by taking on new challenges, working with new teams or trying management experience without switching companies or job titles.
But sometimes lateral job changes aren't enough. Melissa Tidwell, the general counsel of Reddit, said lawyers who want to switch companies for a new position can be transparent with managers about the skills they want to develop or grow for that next step.
“They're excited to see you succeed. Going out and expanding and growing,” Tidwell said. “My mantra to my teams are your success is my success. So to the extent that it's time for you to move on … rock on, that's awesome and you should not be afraid. I had honest conversations with my boss at Google.”
The ability to have honest conversation stems from trust, Tidwell said, something panelists stressed was crucial for in-house counsel to develop across department lines. Jill Dessalines, a legal career consultant and former assistant general counsel at McKesson Corp., said people are more likely to take advice from those they trust. Edgett said in-house counsel should make sure executives know legal is ”on their side” when dispensing legal advice.
Trust and reputation can also be built by volunteering for new projects, spotting areas legal can improve and taking initiative to fix them, and taking on important but less-exciting work others may ignore, panelists said. Tidwell worked with engineers—one of whom referred her to her current position—and Edgett took on intellectual property and real estate work.
Panelists noted new in-house counsel often struggle with the soft-skill aspects of trust-building.
“It's credibility, reliability, follow through. And bringing people along your thinking. And then the authenticity … is huge and sometimes, I think, undervalued,” Edgett said.
In-house counsel transitioning from law firms may also struggle with corporate communication styles, said Katie Biber, the general counsel of crypto custodian Anchorage. When asked what advice she'd give new in-house lawyers, she said one thing: “brevity.”
Company leaders need legal advice fast, relayed in a way that's easy to understand. But many recent in-house hires fall into firm-style communication patterns, sending long emails filled with every possible legal risk.
“It's totally brevity … it's making mistakes and being OK with it,” Tidwell said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 2Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
- 3PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
- 4The Dynamic Duo Behind CMG's Legal Ops Team
- 5Land Use Issues Presented By Cold Storage Warehouses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250