ALT Launches Webinar Series, Hoping to Break Silos with Focused Discussions
The first ALT Webinar is titled 'Beyond the Hype: Understanding Technology Adoption in BigLaw' and will take place on May 3.
April 16, 2019 at 01:30 PM
4 minute read
In its second year, February's Association of Legal Technologists (ALT) Conference in Scottsdale, Ariz., had two main goals: bringing design thinking to law, and promoting collaboration between different silos of law that might not necessarily connect otherwise. Now, ALT is hoping to expand the second of those ideas throughout the year, beginning a series of webinars with the hopes of beginning a conversation and creating a community.
Dubbed ALT Webinars, the series will look to bring together speakers from a variety of backgrounds—perhaps some outside of legal technology—with the hopes to provide wide-ranging conversations among stakeholders with different backgrounds for cross-fertilization, according to Anna McGrane, COO of PacerPro and an organizer of ALT's Young Leaders Committee.
The first ALT Webinar is titled “Beyond the Hype: Understanding Technology Adoption in BigLaw” and will take place on May 3. The speakers include a mixture of law firm and legal technologist panelists, with Richard Hoberman, AI practice consultant at Kira Systems; Vishal Agnihotri, chief knowledge officer at Hinshaw & Culbertson; Monet Fauntleroy, senior manager, practice innovation at White & Case; and McGrane herself. Bob Ambrogi, who runs LawSites Blog, will moderate.
This mix of different perspectives was purposefully done, and will be a focus on the webinars moving forward according to McGrane. “By bringing together experts with differing backgrounds, we're hoping to provoke constructive, critical dialogue re: the people and process elements of technology adoption and innovation in legal,” she explained.
Plus, added David Umlah, ALT's head of business development, it doesn't hurt if it starts a conversation. He noted, “We hope people come away more knowledgeable with an appreciation for new perspectives—not necessarily conventional staid opinions.”
In keeping with those differing backgrounds, McGrane noted that not only are the four speakers coming from different companies or firms, but from different perspectives as well. “Vishal has Big 4 and Fortune 500 experience and is now leading knowledge and collaboration initiatives at Hinshaw Culbertson. Monet is a former practicing lawyer with startup and established vendor experience who, among other things, helps legaltech companies navigate their relationship with a large law firm. Richard and I are both former big law lawyers now at vendors; I head up the enterprise implementation of a workflow and experience capture tool and he trains lawyers to use an AI tool.”
Indeed, the concept of breaking down silos is often a conversation in legal technology circles, but may be easier said than done. From McGrane's view, actually accomplishing this goal is a matter of tackling communication problems first.
“If a library manager has never spoken to their [managing attorney's office], has never met their paralegal manager, who doesn't know what data [business development] needs for RFPs, and the attorneys are all unapproachable, the firm is going to move slowly—and to be frank, not that well, relative to its peers,” she explained. “If, on the other hand, the managers and timekeepers have a close working relationship and all the teams are aligned with the firm's strategic vision, roll-out is a breeze.”
Facilitating those working relationships will be a priority in future webinars as well. The topics for those have not yet been announced, but will include speakers such as Joe Borstein (global director, Pangea3), Felicity Conrad (CEO, Paladin), Chad Main (host, Technically Legal), Andrea Markstrom (CIO, Blank Rome), Basha Rubin (CEO, Priori), James Sherer (partner, BakerHostetler), and Jae Um (director of pricing strategy, Baker McKenzie).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Bradley Arant, Moore & Van Allen Join Partner Promotions Parade
- 27th Circ. Rejects Liability Claims Against Freight Broker's Hiring Choices
- 3Sullivan & Cromwell Signals 5-Day RTO Expectation as Law Firms Remain Split on Optimal Attendance
- 4CLOSED: These Georgia Courts Won't Open Jan. 10
- 5Volkswagen Hit With Consumer Class Action Alleging Defective SUV Engines
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250