UK Breaches Drop, While Scope of Targets May Be Narrowing
Don't breathe a sigh of relief yet. While a U.K. survey found fewer businesses are reporting breaches, that decline could be prefaced by cyberattackers successfully—and more frequently—targeting a smaller group of organizations.
April 16, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
On April 3, the U.K. Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport published the Cyber Security Breaches Survey. Only 32% of U.K. businesses contacted for the survey said their data was breached or attacked, a decrease from 2018's 43%. While that 11% decline might seem like a congratulatory statistic, it may underscore a trend of a smaller group of companies being successfully—and more frequently—targeted with cyberattacks.
The report was conducted with 1,500-plus U.K. businesses and 514 U.K. registered charities between October and December 2018. The fourth annual report is the first cybersecurity breach survey conducted after the GDPR went into effect.
The survey didn't provide an exact explanation for the drop in cyberattacks, citing various possibilities, including increased spending on cybersecurity and fewer companies willing to admit a breach occurred in light of the General Data Protection Regulation.
Another possibility is that hackers could be focusing on a narrower set of businesses. The survey found that the 32% who said their company's cybersecurity was attacked faced six median attacks in 2018, compared to the median two attacks in 2017. Notably, information or communications firms organizations accounted for 47% of cybersecurity breaches or attacks in 2018, according to the report.
Dentons London-based partner Simon Elliott said the survey's overall decline in breaches is counter to what he's seen but agreed that hackers might be targeting a narrower scope of companies. “The overall volume is reduced, rather than trying a lot of low-level very unsophisticated phishing attacks,” Elliott said. In turn, targeted organizations are increasing their level of protection and security to block the sophisticated cyberattacks, he said.
Of the 637 breached businesses, the top cyberattacks aimed at them varied from phishing attacks to ransomware. Specifically, 80% of those breached said they were attacked through a fraudulent email or by clicking a link on a fake website. Trailing a distant second were 28% who reported they were victim to someone impersonating an organization through an email or other online communication. Viruses, spyware or malware was the third-most popular type of attack suffered by organizations.
As organizations' data continues to be a target and despite the GDPR's implementation and required protocols, only 16% of businesses and 11% of charities in the U.K. have a formal cybersecurity incident management process, according to the survey.
To be sure, such written policies are only as beneficial as the steps taken by staff to safeguard data.
“I'm not saying policies and procedures aren't useful; they help codify what you do,” said Cripps senior associate Elliot Fry. “Ultimately, it isn't going to change anything if your on the ground practices aren't changing.”
Fry added companies should “have a continuously improving cybersecurity practice and have some dedicated individuals that are keeping aware of progress rather than having a comprehensive paper policy.”
Cyberinsurance also can protect companies after a cyberattack or incident, but according to the survey, only 11% of U.K. companies have such policies.
Dentons' Elliott said organizations are hesitant because they are unsure what will be covered under such plans. “The market hasn't settled on what is covered or what is the depth of coverage for them,” he explained.
Elliott cited a case pending in an Illinois court where U.S. snack-maker Mondelez International is suing its insurance company for $100 million after its claim over a ransomware attack was rejected. The insurance company said the cyberattack was an act of war not covered under its policy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250