Data Breaches Look to Be the Next Trend in Class Action Litigation
The next wave of class action lawsuits will be the result of massive data breaches, according to the eighth annual Carlton Fields Class Action Survey.
April 17, 2019 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The next wave of class action lawsuits will be the result of massive data breaches, according to the eighth annual Carlton Fields Class Action Survey released Tuesday.
The survey is based on interviews with general counsel or senior legal officers at 395 Fortune 1000 companies in the U.S.
In 2017, 28.9 percent of corporate counsel said the next wave of class action suits would come from data privacy and security. That number nearly doubled in 2018 with 54 percent of respondents believing that the next wave of class action suits will come from data privacy and security issues.
The report also said in-house lawyers are more concerned with the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which takes effect in 2020, than they are of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR.
Kavon Adli, the founder of The Internet Law Group in Beverly Hills, California, said, however, companies should be as, if not more, concerned with the GDPR.
“I think the risk of a class action is more limited in the case of the CCPA,” Adli said.
He explained the data security is a limited area of the CCPA that provides for a right of action. Whereas the GDPR provides for a private right of action for all of its provisions.
“The CCPA is still sort of in flux. There have been some legislative processes and there may still be more before it goes into effect,” Adli said. “At the current time it is far more limited than the GDPR.”
Julianna McCabe, the director of the National Class Action Survey and a shareholder at Carlton Fields, said the state laws like the CCPA and Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act make it easier to file class action suits.
“When the legislators in those states pass laws that allow consumers to bring private rights of action regarding these data issues companies are rightly concerned,” McCabe said. “California in particular is a place where class actions are filed more than in any other state in the nation. California is an issue; Illinois is an issue, and other states are starting to copy those laws that are probably going to get passed in the next three to five years.”
Edward McAndrew, a partner at DLA Piper in Washington, D.C., said the CCPA has a provision that entitles California residents to some level of damages. He also said residents do not need to prove a direct injury because of the data breach, just that the company violated the CCPA.
“Early on we saw a lot of cases being dismissed on standing grounds. With these statutory causes of action it's going to be much more difficult to get cases dismissed at a preliminary stage,” McAndrew said. “Those cases haven't been going into a full scale discovery period.”
Because of this, he explained there will be extensive and expensive discovery that companies will be subjected to.
“Those are going to six and seven figure expenses for these companies,” McAndrew explained.
According to the report, companies spent $2.46 billion defending class actions in 2018. That spending is the highest companies have paid in defending class actions suits since 2008. Most companies, according to the report, are facing class action lawsuits only in the United States.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Rise and Risks of Merchant Cash Advance Debt Relief Companies
- 2Ill. Class Action Claims Cannabis Companies Sell Products with Excessive THC Content
- 3Suboxone MDL Mostly Survives Initial Preemption Challenge
- 4Paul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
- 5Global Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250