Law Firm Recruiting Tries to Keep Up with Blockchain Boom
Don't be fooled by the cryptocurrency crash—legal recruiters say there's still huge demand for blockchain expertise, as well as lawyers who understand data privacy.
April 18, 2019 at 02:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
It's no secret that blockchain and cryptocurrency are fast-growing specializations within the financial industry—JPMorgan Chase & Co. just tested its own digital currency—and law firms are busily snatching up lawyers with expertise in the emerging fields.
Major, Lindsey & Africa managing director Brian Burlant, who recruits for law firms and in-house legal departments, said it's been hard to keep up with demand for attorneys who understand the promise and risks associated with the technologies, as well as those with expertise in digital privacy.
Blockchain's applications extend far beyond heavily publicized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, and include accounting, supply chain logistics, health care and advertising.
“What I am seeing in blockchain and in crypto is that firms are cautiously making forays into this space—feeling out for talent, trying to assess where are the trends from their clients coming; so it is very much a work in progress and everyone expects the weight of business to increase,” Burlant said. “We have also seen lawyers entering this space from regulatory practices or government, specifically securities regulation and white-collar/investigations practices, as regards to cryptocurrencies in particular,” he added.
Mary K. Young, a partner at Zeughauser Group, the law firm consultancy, said privacy law has also grown tremendously, “and my own experience backs that up, based on marketing research I did a year ago and also my experience with clients. Most global and national firms have added significant capabilities in privacy and data security in the last five years,” she said.
Examples of recent lateral moves across these fields include Andrew “Drew” Hinkes, who joined Carlton Fields' chain and digital currency practice in Miami as of counsel earlier this year, while also serving as chief legal officer for investment tech firm Athena Blockchain Inc.; J.R.Lanis, who arrived at Polsinelli in Los Angeles as a shareholder and chair of the West Coast corporate and securities practice from Drinker Biddle; and David Katz, a partner in Adams and Reese's privacy, cybersecurity and data management practice who joined the firm in Atlanta in February from Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough.
“I think that the blockchain space was extremely popular for lawyers toward the end of 2017, and then the cryptocurrency crash happened, and a lot of lawyers who were working in crypto or blockchain went back quietly to whatever they were doing before, like Silicon Valley in the '90s” said Lanis. “Those who have stuck with it will continue to see a lot of activity in this area.”
Privacy law is heating up as more and more countries and states regulate enterprises that store and utilize vast amounts of personal data and transmit it via the internet, Burlant said. The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, which took effect last May, and the similar California Consumer Privacy Act signed into law last year and effective January 2020, are examples of burgeoning data privacy regulation across the globe. A proposed amendment to California's law also would give a private right of action to consumers within the state whose rights are violated under the law, which potentially could expose companies to a flood of lawsuits.
Young said lateral hiring is increasing at both large and small firms as they try to build up their practices in data privacy and security. Firms are also promoting associates with relevant expertise from within both their corporate and litigation ranks. She said lawyers starting their careers can prepare by seeking out firms known for their privacy or blockchain/cryptocurrency practices.
“A person coming out of law school can look for a firm known for this, a marquee name. They do the work for people who can train them. It is very complex work because it involves technology and technical knowledge.”
A science and technology background, or at least familiarity, is a plus for anyone hoping to get a foothold in this growing specialty, but practitioners are not all science and tech majors, Burlant said. “For law students and those early in their legal careers, coupling a practical business approach with a working understanding of the technology is a good way to go,” he said. “Emerging and Fortune 500 companies are taking the lead in applying these technologies; there will be opportunities in representing clients in both sectors.”
He said demand is such that even lawyers from law schools outside the usual “Top 14” have been able to parlay specialized expertise into Big Law firms.
But he advises, “don't focus on the crypto, focus on the blockchain. It will be a game changer.”
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250