How Tech Startups Can Tackle Trade Secret Theft Without Lawsuits
Intellectual property or trade secret litigation can be a costly prospect for many tech startups, but lawyers say there's front-end and non-litigation remedies to mediate and prevent the problem.
April 18, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
Trade secret and intellectual property lawsuits can be a lengthy and expensive but necessary prospect for any tech company looking to protect its assets. But for tech startups that may not have the budget to sustain litigation if they suspect an ex-employee took company trade secrets, filing those suits likely isn't an option.
However, there are steps startups can take to protect their trade secrets. Such front-end precautions include adding nondisclosures, monitoring personal devices used for work, and defining ownership rights in work agreements. Taking these pre-emptive actions could help startups avoid a costly courtroom battle.
“You can't ultimately prevent someone from doing bad things, but you can put yourself in the best position,” said San Francisco-based DLA Piper partner Margaret Keane. She noted that while trade secret theft has always been an issue, today's technology allows employees to more easily take information from one company to the next.
To combat theft, lawyers suggested tech startups should encourage employees to work on company-owned devices, which enables them to examine and monitor an employee's activity.
“If you, as a company, own your own network, and can monitor it all, you have a much better chance to see if someone is stealing something and you can request and get back those computers,” said David Axtell, a partner focusing on intellectual property at Stinson Leonard Street.
What's more, before someone joins the company, they should ideally sign a work agreement that includes whistleblower protection, a requirement under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, said David R. Barnard, a Stinson Leonard partner.
Without that whistleblower provision, Barnard explained, companies lose a federal cause of action granted under the 2016 law.
Additionally, tech companies should be aware that employee intellectual property agreements must notify employees regarding legal limits on the types of intellectual property rights an employer can demand from employees. This is a statutory requirement in Delaware, Illinois, California, Kansas, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Utah and Washington state, Barnard noted.
Still, how can a company and their counsel know if an ex-employee has taken off with IP assets? With social media, of course. Barnard said he's seen a trade secret theft dispute start based on a LinkedIn post because it “looked like [the former employees] are doing something that they did at the prior company.”
While such an allegation would need to be substantiated with evidence, “if you suspect this may be happening, keep a close eye on their marketing line,” Barnard said. “If their new hot thing is something your previous employee was working on for you, that may be a good tip.”
However, a selfie taken in the new office won't substantiate a claim of trade secret theft. Instead, evidence usually found during a forensic investigation will likely be key.
After examining work devices the employee used while at the company, filing a suit isn't always a necessary next step for startups. Lawyers said a letter sent to the employee's new company may be enough to stop any possible misuse of data.
“If you don't have funding for a lawsuit it can be difficult, however, neither does the person that just left so you sometimes can send letters and phone calls to get your point across and make sure your trade secret isn't used inappropriately,” Axtell said.
Also, a company can seek other legal remedies if they suspect data that wasn't necessarily trade secrets was taken.
Axtell noted, “Don't forget that startups may have other rights. … For example, if an employee leaves and takes a software-based code with them that belongs to the company, that can be a copyright infringement or a good old-fashioned theft.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250