Albany Law, SUNY Poly Launch Interdisciplinary 'Innovation Clinic' to Commercialize Tech
With a new partnership, law and engineering students at the New York-based colleges will work in tandem to take technology from the lab to the marketplace.
April 19, 2019 at 01:30 PM
3 minute read
Albany Law School and the SUNY Polytechnic Institute are teaming up to offer law, business and engineering students a program to gain hands-on experience in shepherding SUNY products from the lab to the market. The aim is to learn firsthand how commercializing technology includes not just science and engineering expertise, but legal and regulatory prowess.
To be sure, the announcement isn't Albany Law's first collaboration with SUNY. Indeed, since 2004 SUNY's Research Foundation has offered Albany Law students internships to essentially manage SUNY's patents. Albany Law is also no stranger to technology, as it recently offered a course for students to create tech solutions for legal challenges. This new venture with SUNY Poly, however, brings students with differing expertise and majors together with the goal of making a technology product purchasable by the public.
The program, called the Innovation Intensive Clinic, will launch this fall and will be open to 2L and 3L Albany Law students, who aren't required to have an engineering or tech background, and SUNY Poly business and engineering students.
Specifically, law students will use their legal skills to negotiate contracts and patents and consider any regulatory requirements for their team's product. They will also extend their knowledge of the tech field through working with engineers, said Albany Law president and dean Alicia Ouellette.
Ouellette noted the program was a response to a growing employer demand for lawyers to understand technology and be able to work with tech professionals. The program also serves to commercialize technology created by SUNY, which includes products related to semiconductor sensors, computer chips, drones, and biomedical and life sciences innovations.
“Part of our mission at SUNY is to commercialize technology, to get SUNY technology from lab to market,” said Heather Hage, Research Foundation vice president for industry and external affairs. “To do that, university startups are an increasingly common way to make that happen.”
She added, lawyers “are working hand-in-hand with scientists who have deep, deep expertise in their discipline. It's that convergences of those areas, the legal, business and scientist, that make the strongest teams in practice. You need those things together.”
Indeed, the composition of many tech startup includes a developer applying their tech knowledge to create a product and a lawyer leveraging her legal expertise to draft and negotiate contracts, file patents and navigate regulations.
Recently, for example, the lawyer-engineer duo behind Jet.Law and CaseGuide Inc. secured an investment from startup accelerator Y Combinator. What's more, artificial intelligence-powered contract manager Evisort, which is the brainchild of Harvard Law and MIT graduates, announced in February that it raised $4.5 million.
While the job market looks promising for lawyers who have experience working with engineers, Albany Law's Ouellette noted that the experience of working with people with different expertise can also provide an invaluable skill set for any professional.
“I think it's a really phenomenal opportunity for students to be immersed in what is a different culture, just like a language immersion program, you will be fluent in tech and you can't lose with gaining that knowledge,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1State Law Falls Short on Disability Rights
- 2People in the News—Nov. 26, 2024—Barley Snyder, McNees
- 3Akin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
- 4Walking a Minute in Your Adversary’s Shoes: Addressing the Issue of 'Naive Realism' at Mediation
- 5The Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250