In-House Innovation: Managed Service Providers Targeting Corporate Law
Managed legal service providers are gunning for the opportunity to do work once reserved for outside counsel, and some legal departments are all ears.
April 23, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
As legal departments want law firm quality services for less than the traditional cost of those services, managed legal service providers are seeing an opening. Indeed, many have recently moved to offer broader legal services to corporate legal departments, and have found a receptive client base in doing so.
In February, for instance, LawClerk extended the use of its roster of on-demand attorneys from solo and boutique firms to corporate law departments with LawClerk for General Counsel. Additionally, Yerra Solutions expanded into managed services and now deploys attorneys to manage legal departments' contracts and legal invoices.
Meanwhile, legal operations provider Legility, which in November changed its name after Counsel On Call acquired DSicovery, recently announced the launch of Enterprise Legal Solution, an integrated offering of remote and on-site legal counseling and legal technology for corporate legal departments.
The services include Legility attorneys performing due diligence for deals, drafting and negotiating contracts and managing regulatory and compliance changes.
In addition to providing human resources, the service also offers what the company describes as “lightweight apps” used to assist legal departments in improving processes and manage the flow of information. For example, Legility IQ culls a legal department's data and provides a real-time view of spend and activity.
Still, as in-house turns to vendors for legal services, law firms aren't concerned because “they don't see an extrinsic threat to their advice and counsel,” said Jamal Stockton, a Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) board member.
“We know the quality [of a law firm] is excellent,” Stockton noted. “The law firms are trusted; we've worked with them for a long time, but are we paying the appropriate amount.”
However, a larger disruption in the market is afoot with corporate legal departments actively looking for ways to measure a law firm's quality compared to vendors, Stockton said. One area that is easy to gauge is e-discovery.
“If you think about e-discovery, we can measure the accuracy of what is being done,” Stockton said, adding if the service provider has provided identical results to a law firm, “there's no incentive to use a law firm.”
Ultimately what in-house legal departments are often looking for is a single one-stop shop for legal services.
“I want to see the legal management service providers rebundle so we can go to one provider,” Stockton said.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 2Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 3Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 4Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 5In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250