Will 'Free Samples' Get More Firms On-Board with Automation?
With the legal sector notoriously hesitant about investing in new tech, providers are betting that lowering the bar to entry could be the key to wider adoption.
April 30, 2019 at 09:30 AM
4 minute read
Earlier this month, digital IT provider Alphaserve Technologies launched a new "process discovery as a service" (P-DaaS) offering which would allow law firms and other users to identify a workflow process that may be eligible for automation as part of a limited engagement designed to drive adoption. If the firm chooses to proceed, Alphaserve will help implement the robotic process automation.
Promoting adoption can be notoriously difficult in the legal sphere, which has a reputation for a being a bit slow on the draw when it comes to bringing on board new technologies. Firms are reluctant to invest time and money in a product that may not ultimately fit into its ecosystem. But for many legal tech and managed services providers, the way around that hesitancy is to give them a chance to try before they buy.
"Firms are struggling with how to figure out what areas are good candidates for automation. Law firms do not want to spend upwards of $100,000 for process mapping through interviews with expensive consultants," said Arup Das, Alphaserve's chief executive officer.
Such a "freemium model," as Alphaserve calls it, offers simple and basic services for free with the user having the option to try more advanced or additional features at a premium. Alphaserve took a similar approach with some of its previous AI engagements, relying on free "ideation sessions" to help clients figure out the technology could be deployed within their business model.
It's a model that seems geared towards actively stripping away the excuses an average firm or company would use not to adopt technology—and that includes installation challenges. While cloud-based services are typically less expensive than investing in on premise infrastructure, Das said the cloud was an option only for firms with relaxed security controls. A majority of firms, he added, install the software on-site.
To offset some of the potential cost barriers associated with that reality, Alphaserve's automation as a service offering, separate from P-DaaS, includes helping firms design and execute a plan for robotic process implementation and provides automation maintenance as needed.
"We are offering automation as a service for firms that have on premise infrastructure so that the firm does not have to pay a large price upfront to adopt the technology," Das said.
To be sure, Alphaserve isn't the only legal tech company to see the potential value in making some of those up front investments appear less daunting. Last December, it was announced that legal technology management company Kuro Group would begin hosting ONE Discovery's software on its OnRamp program, essentially allowing users to come in and rent infrastructure like software and servers without incurring per GB charges.
Alexis Lewis, co-founder and chief strategy officer at Kuro Group, told Legaltech News that the service would provide a less expensive option then using cloud-based software as a service or deploying e-discovery products on premise.
"The cheapest way to do discovery is stand up the servers, run the software and train your staff on it," he said.
Even the the cloud-based services that don't rely on much in the way of physical infrastructure seem to recognize the need to make their offerings seem less financially imposing. Earlier this year, Relativity announced new pricing and licensing models for its cloud-based RelativityOne solution, including lowering overall data fees up to 50 percent and providing the option to subscribe based on monthly usage instead of the former three year pre-commit fixed subscription model. Users therefore are not tied to the platform, and can try it out at e-discovery tool without a full commitment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250