Will 'Free Samples' Get More Firms On-Board with Automation?
With the legal sector notoriously hesitant about investing in new tech, providers are betting that lowering the bar to entry could be the key to wider adoption.
April 30, 2019 at 09:30 AM
4 minute read
Earlier this month, digital IT provider Alphaserve Technologies launched a new "process discovery as a service" (P-DaaS) offering which would allow law firms and other users to identify a workflow process that may be eligible for automation as part of a limited engagement designed to drive adoption. If the firm chooses to proceed, Alphaserve will help implement the robotic process automation.
Promoting adoption can be notoriously difficult in the legal sphere, which has a reputation for a being a bit slow on the draw when it comes to bringing on board new technologies. Firms are reluctant to invest time and money in a product that may not ultimately fit into its ecosystem. But for many legal tech and managed services providers, the way around that hesitancy is to give them a chance to try before they buy.
"Firms are struggling with how to figure out what areas are good candidates for automation. Law firms do not want to spend upwards of $100,000 for process mapping through interviews with expensive consultants," said Arup Das, Alphaserve's chief executive officer.
Such a "freemium model," as Alphaserve calls it, offers simple and basic services for free with the user having the option to try more advanced or additional features at a premium. Alphaserve took a similar approach with some of its previous AI engagements, relying on free "ideation sessions" to help clients figure out the technology could be deployed within their business model.
It's a model that seems geared towards actively stripping away the excuses an average firm or company would use not to adopt technology—and that includes installation challenges. While cloud-based services are typically less expensive than investing in on premise infrastructure, Das said the cloud was an option only for firms with relaxed security controls. A majority of firms, he added, install the software on-site.
To offset some of the potential cost barriers associated with that reality, Alphaserve's automation as a service offering, separate from P-DaaS, includes helping firms design and execute a plan for robotic process implementation and provides automation maintenance as needed.
"We are offering automation as a service for firms that have on premise infrastructure so that the firm does not have to pay a large price upfront to adopt the technology," Das said.
To be sure, Alphaserve isn't the only legal tech company to see the potential value in making some of those up front investments appear less daunting. Last December, it was announced that legal technology management company Kuro Group would begin hosting ONE Discovery's software on its OnRamp program, essentially allowing users to come in and rent infrastructure like software and servers without incurring per GB charges.
Alexis Lewis, co-founder and chief strategy officer at Kuro Group, told Legaltech News that the service would provide a less expensive option then using cloud-based software as a service or deploying e-discovery products on premise.
"The cheapest way to do discovery is stand up the servers, run the software and train your staff on it," he said.
Even the the cloud-based services that don't rely on much in the way of physical infrastructure seem to recognize the need to make their offerings seem less financially imposing. Earlier this year, Relativity announced new pricing and licensing models for its cloud-based RelativityOne solution, including lowering overall data fees up to 50 percent and providing the option to subscribe based on monthly usage instead of the former three year pre-commit fixed subscription model. Users therefore are not tied to the platform, and can try it out at e-discovery tool without a full commitment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250