Can't Transfer Risk: Original Data Sellers Likely Liable for Vendors' Breaches
Data seller beware, a breach of a defunct vendor will likely result in lawsuits and perhaps regulatory penalties, lawyers say.
May 03, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
According to cybersecurity company Upguard, a now-dissolved Facebook app uploaded sensitive user data, including app users' passwords and Facebook user information, to a public online storage website.
While the alleged mishandling of data may seem minuscule compared to Facebook's other data privacy concerns, which may led to a potential $5 billion fine from the Federal Trade Commission, the April report highlights a concern any data seller can have: How will third parties handle such data, and am I to be held responsible if it's breached?
While many often enter into contractual agreements with third parties to protect themselves from liability, this may not be enough to shield the original data seller from lawsuits if a defunct or active vendor is breached.
“In general if you are the organization that is gathering the information, collecting and determining how the information is being used, you are probably responsible for what happens to it even if vendors are processing it,” said Victoria Beckman, a Frost Brown Todd partner and co-chair of the privacy and data security team, who spoke generally and not about the Facebook report.
That legal responsibility boils down to the original seller of data obtaining permission from an individual to collect the data and promising to keep it safe, Beckman said.
Fox Rothschild partner Michael Kline also noted that even a company filing bankruptcy may not absolve it of legal responsibility over a data breach.
“For general types of breaches beyond the health care realm, I think it's interesting that the liability of the company that goes out of business may not be able to avoid it by declaring bankruptcy,” Klien said. “[With] that type of obligation, depending upon the circumstances, how egregious it was, what type of information it involved, you may be in a situation where people try to get personal liability against the individuals in that company.”
To be sure, while most industries in the U.S. don't regulate data sharing, the health care industry is a large exception.
A covered entity, which under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act includes a health care clearinghouse, health care providers and health insurance companies, that shares information with a third party must have a business associate agreement under HIPAA, said Fox Rothschild partner and HIPAA privacy and security officer Elizabeth Litten.
According to a 2013 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services report, the business associate agreement mandates, among other requirements, that the “business associate will not use or further disclose the information other than as permitted or required by the contract or as required by law.” It also requires “the business associate to implement appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized use or disclosure of the information, including implementing requirements of the HIPAA Security Rule with regard to electronic protected health information.”
While those regulations are specific to HIPAA covered entities, Litten said the law's transparency and consent requirements offer best practices relevant to data sharing in any industry.
“You can take that consent to a non-health care setting in terms of looking at if you are collecting information from users and consumers, making sure when you are disclosing it if you're doing it in a minimal necessary way.”
Obtaining prior consent can lead to less litigation and headaches, Litten said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250