Microsoft Deputy GC and Top EU Regulator Reflect on Year 1 of the GDPR
Microsoft deputy general counsel Julie Brill spoke with European Data Protection Board chairwoman Andrea Jelinek about lessons learned from the GDPR one year in and what comes next at an IAPP Global Privacy Summit session Friday.
May 06, 2019 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
It's been nearly a year since the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation went into effect, sparking conversations and compliance efforts in legal departments worldwide.
At a Friday morning International Association of Privacy Professionals Global Privacy Summit session in Washington, D.C., Microsoft deputy general counsel and corporate vice president Julie Brill spoke with Andrea Jelinek, European Data Protection Board chairwoman and Austrian Data Protection Authority director, about GDPR's first year of challenges and changes and what could come next.
“The world didn't stop turning on May 26 … but the most impressive, most surprising issue was the interest for data protection, the interest [in] privacy didn't stop,” Jelinek said.
Instead, it's spread. In the wake of GDPR's May 25, 2018 start date, California passed the first U.S. state privacy law and both the U.S. House and Senate have held hearings on a possible federal law, taking lessons from GDPR.
One of Jelinek's initial GDPR lessons: regulators and companies should work toward compliance together. She said data protection officers' importance “never can be overestimated.” GDPR requires certain companies appoint a DPO to work with regulators on data protection issues. More than 5,000 DPOs have registered in Austria alone, Jelinek said.
“What is most important, the most important thing is that [DPOs] know their company,” she said, and DPOs can “translate” communications to regulators, executives and in-house counsel.
When shaping a U.S. law, Jelinek also suggested a “carrot and stick” approach. That means the U.S. needs an “enforcer to be taken seriously” with strength, money, staff and the authority to investigate infringement. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission currently has 40 staffers. In an IAPP summit session yesterday the agency's chairman Joseph Simons said the FTC would have to “beef up” to enforce a federal privacy law.
Jelinek said she's hoping for a strong federal U.S. law, in part because “so many U.S. citizens were affected” by recent privacy scandals and may have lost trust in American companies.
It's also simpler for companies if countries worldwide adopt privacy laws similar to GDPR, she said. Canada, Japan, Argentina and other countries have received “adequacy decisions,” from the EU, meaning their data protection standards meet Europe's.
“When you have global alignment, not copy and paste but a global alignment on the principles, how we're going to collect data … and the rights of individuals then it will be much easier for all of us,” she said.
Brill asked whether California would be granted adequacy because of CCPA, as a submarket in a country currently without a federal privacy law. Jelinek declined to give a definite answer, but she said it's a discussion the European Data Protection Board has heard.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 3Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 4In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 5Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250