Compliance App Looks for Data Companies Don't Know They're Collecting
The legal tech marketplace has no shortage of compliance solutions, but the latest from Norton Rose Fulbright isn't just a repository for legal advice or insight.
May 07, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
Last week, the law firm Norton Rose Fulbright launched the Network Traffic Analyzer (NTA), a new data protection tool designed to help organizations keep track of data they didn't even know they were collecting. Such data could possibly be bringing them into conflict with any one of a number of data privacy regulations sweeping the globe.
That raises a lot of questions, the most pertinent of which might be, are companies really still struggling with compliance almost one year after the European Union's sweeping General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force?
“When we get hired, it's not like we generally find pictures of good compliance or near compliance. We generally find a lot of stuff,” said Steven Roosa, head of digital analytics and technology assessment platform at Norton Rose.
Companies turning to their law firms for an assist with cybersecurity and privacy compliance is certainly nothing new. Last fall, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie formed a partnership with cybersecurity consulting firm eosedge Legal in order to sharpen its edge in the field of technical cybersecurity. Apps specializing in compliance—like Parsons Behle & Latimer's CCPA IQ—are also in vogue.
Still, NTA was always designed to be more than a digital repository for legal advice. According to Roosa, keeping track of all the different laws on the book is actually not the most arduous part of compliance for most organizations.
“It's even more difficult to know what data your app or website is actually collecting or sharing,” Roosa said.
At least some of that has to do with the third party software development kits (SDKs) that developers incorporate into their own source code to help with analytics or advertising. According to Roosa, it's not uncommon for an app to contain up to 10 different SDKs, all of which could be collecting data that falls into the personally identifiable information category.
“Oftentimes, free [third party] services will often take data and then re-purpose that for their own data selling,” Roosa said.
Meanwhile, the organization deploying the app may be totally unaware that this additional information has been collected at all. NTA was designed to identify that data—coded or not—and check it against potential conflicts with various privacy regulations. Legal insight, however, is still crucial.
“It's funny for a technical solution to say this, but our biggest advantage is definitely the global team's input on what matters and exactly what we need to find in terms of types of information,” Roosa said.
While this iteration of the NTA may be geared towards compliance, Roosa thinks there could also be potential applications down the line that could help offset the leakage of proprietary data within a company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250