Compliance App Looks for Data Companies Don't Know They're Collecting
The legal tech marketplace has no shortage of compliance solutions, but the latest from Norton Rose Fulbright isn't just a repository for legal advice or insight.
May 07, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
Last week, the law firm Norton Rose Fulbright launched the Network Traffic Analyzer (NTA), a new data protection tool designed to help organizations keep track of data they didn't even know they were collecting. Such data could possibly be bringing them into conflict with any one of a number of data privacy regulations sweeping the globe.
That raises a lot of questions, the most pertinent of which might be, are companies really still struggling with compliance almost one year after the European Union's sweeping General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force?
“When we get hired, it's not like we generally find pictures of good compliance or near compliance. We generally find a lot of stuff,” said Steven Roosa, head of digital analytics and technology assessment platform at Norton Rose.
Companies turning to their law firms for an assist with cybersecurity and privacy compliance is certainly nothing new. Last fall, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie formed a partnership with cybersecurity consulting firm eosedge Legal in order to sharpen its edge in the field of technical cybersecurity. Apps specializing in compliance—like Parsons Behle & Latimer's CCPA IQ—are also in vogue.
Still, NTA was always designed to be more than a digital repository for legal advice. According to Roosa, keeping track of all the different laws on the book is actually not the most arduous part of compliance for most organizations.
“It's even more difficult to know what data your app or website is actually collecting or sharing,” Roosa said.
At least some of that has to do with the third party software development kits (SDKs) that developers incorporate into their own source code to help with analytics or advertising. According to Roosa, it's not uncommon for an app to contain up to 10 different SDKs, all of which could be collecting data that falls into the personally identifiable information category.
“Oftentimes, free [third party] services will often take data and then re-purpose that for their own data selling,” Roosa said.
Meanwhile, the organization deploying the app may be totally unaware that this additional information has been collected at all. NTA was designed to identify that data—coded or not—and check it against potential conflicts with various privacy regulations. Legal insight, however, is still crucial.
“It's funny for a technical solution to say this, but our biggest advantage is definitely the global team's input on what matters and exactly what we need to find in terms of types of information,” Roosa said.
While this iteration of the NTA may be geared towards compliance, Roosa thinks there could also be potential applications down the line that could help offset the leakage of proprietary data within a company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
- 2Lack of Jurisdiction Dooms Child Sex Abuse Claim Against Archdiocese of Philadelphia, says NJ Supreme Court
- 3DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 4Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 5Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250