Maryland Authorizes Corporations' Records, Communications Through Blockchain
Maryland now allows corporations to use 'electronic networks or databases' for its records and communications, opening the door for wider blockchain use.
May 07, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Maryland now allows corporations to keep their records and transmit corporation communications through blockchain. Its Big Law drafter said the amendments should allow for quicker transactions and shareholder communication.
The amendments to Maryland's General Corporation Law were passed on April 30 and are set to go into effect Oct. 1. Maryland joins Delaware and Wyoming in authorizing incorporated companies to use blockchain-backed corporate records and communication.
Specifically, the amendments allow Maryland-incorporated companies to use “electronic networks or databases”—such as blockchain—to maintain its bylaws, ledgers, shareholder listings and notices, financial statements, corporate's consent and requests submissions and other corporate records and communications.
To be sure, businesses incorporated in Maryland won't have to find the latest blockchain technology to be in accordance to this new law, as the measure still allows corporations to maintain their records and conduct corporate communications through conventional forms. The law also allows its records to be maintained by the corporation or “on behalf of the corporation” by a third-party vendor.
However, Tracy Bacigalupo, a drafter of the amendments and a D.C.- and New York-based Morrison Foerster partner, said the new law provides corporations with new ways to enhance their operations and should be leveraged.
“Maryland companies can issue and track shares electronically on a real-time basis, meaning that delays, inconsistencies and uncertainty caused by manually recording an issuance or a transfer of shares would be drastically reduced or eliminated,” Bacigalupo wrote in an email. “The distinction between record holder and beneficial owner can be eliminated.”
She also added blockchain technology will allow for instantaneous transaction settlements and stockholders and issuers can interact directly and possibly diminish the need for third parties including brokers, custodians and clearinghouses and their related costs.
Asset managers, in particular, that leverage blockchain technology can streamline the “client onboarding process” by significantly reducing the traditional time required to collect and verify data and increase the speed of trade settlements, Bacigalupo explained.
Maryland's law comes two years after Delaware, home of the most incorporated companies, passed a law allowing corporations to maintain corporate records through blockchain. The 2017 passage of the Delaware law sparked Bacigalupo's initiative to bring a similar but a “preferably more flexib[le]” measure to Maryland, noting Maryland is the second-most popular state for incorporations and is the preferred forum for real-estate investment trusts (REITs) and investment companies.
Bacigalupo said she contacted the Maryland State Bar Association's committee on corporation law chair in July 2017 and was tasked with drafting the first proposed bill. The committee went through a “rigorous” review process of her draft and after extensive discussions and explanations it was submitted to the then-sponsoring delegate in Maryland's Senate. However, the bill languished, before being resubmitted last fall and signed into law last week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 2An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 3Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
- 4How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 5Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250