Maryland Authorizes Corporations' Records, Communications Through Blockchain
Maryland now allows corporations to use 'electronic networks or databases' for its records and communications, opening the door for wider blockchain use.
May 07, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
Maryland now allows corporations to keep their records and transmit corporation communications through blockchain. Its Big Law drafter said the amendments should allow for quicker transactions and shareholder communication.
The amendments to Maryland's General Corporation Law were passed on April 30 and are set to go into effect Oct. 1. Maryland joins Delaware and Wyoming in authorizing incorporated companies to use blockchain-backed corporate records and communication.
Specifically, the amendments allow Maryland-incorporated companies to use “electronic networks or databases”—such as blockchain—to maintain its bylaws, ledgers, shareholder listings and notices, financial statements, corporate's consent and requests submissions and other corporate records and communications.
To be sure, businesses incorporated in Maryland won't have to find the latest blockchain technology to be in accordance to this new law, as the measure still allows corporations to maintain their records and conduct corporate communications through conventional forms. The law also allows its records to be maintained by the corporation or “on behalf of the corporation” by a third-party vendor.
However, Tracy Bacigalupo, a drafter of the amendments and a D.C.- and New York-based Morrison Foerster partner, said the new law provides corporations with new ways to enhance their operations and should be leveraged.
“Maryland companies can issue and track shares electronically on a real-time basis, meaning that delays, inconsistencies and uncertainty caused by manually recording an issuance or a transfer of shares would be drastically reduced or eliminated,” Bacigalupo wrote in an email. “The distinction between record holder and beneficial owner can be eliminated.”
She also added blockchain technology will allow for instantaneous transaction settlements and stockholders and issuers can interact directly and possibly diminish the need for third parties including brokers, custodians and clearinghouses and their related costs.
Asset managers, in particular, that leverage blockchain technology can streamline the “client onboarding process” by significantly reducing the traditional time required to collect and verify data and increase the speed of trade settlements, Bacigalupo explained.
Maryland's law comes two years after Delaware, home of the most incorporated companies, passed a law allowing corporations to maintain corporate records through blockchain. The 2017 passage of the Delaware law sparked Bacigalupo's initiative to bring a similar but a “preferably more flexib[le]” measure to Maryland, noting Maryland is the second-most popular state for incorporations and is the preferred forum for real-estate investment trusts (REITs) and investment companies.
Bacigalupo said she contacted the Maryland State Bar Association's committee on corporation law chair in July 2017 and was tasked with drafting the first proposed bill. The committee went through a “rigorous” review process of her draft and after extensive discussions and explanations it was submitted to the then-sponsoring delegate in Maryland's Senate. However, the bill languished, before being resubmitted last fall and signed into law last week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250