Engagement and Encouragement: How In-House Directors Drive Tech Adoption
Having high-level advocates, adopting a cultural approach about technology, and listening to user concerns can help keep tech usage high when the excitement wears off.
May 09, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
Implementing new technology in legal departments isn't easy, but ongoing encouragement and engagements with users can be key to overcoming resistance, according to a panel of legal department tech directors speaking on the second day of iManage's ConnectLive conference.
The discussion was moderated by iManage's chief marketing officer Dan Carmel and included panelists Jeelna Karia, Fidelity's technology management director; Tony Curzio, technology strategy and projects program manager at MassMutual; and Heather Sands, strategic business solutions director of the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers.
Although the road to new tech may be laborious, the tech directors agreed there are some universal objectives that, if met, could deliver high usage. According to the panel, strategies to successfully implement new technology include: obtaining the GC-level blessing that'll sway the c-suite and employees, and training that takes the suggestions and concerns of users seriously. In addition, it's also important to encourage a perspective of adopting new technology as part of a new culture in the legal department and not a project with an eventual end date, and ensuring the new process focuses on storing and collecting data in a central location, the panel said.
To be sure, high hopes and enthusiasm around trading in inefficient tools and processes for newer ones can quickly fade. But in-house tech teams should be vigilant in reaching out to users to find out why adoption rates are low, the panel said.
“You do all this training and you overwhelm them with this information and there's excitement in the air, but you see the adoption rates aren't where you expected them to be,” Karia explained. “You realize the struggles are different from when you started.”
To mediate that disconnect, Karia said her team went to users and asked them how they routinely managed documents and what their concerns were with the new system. In response to their answers, her team personalized features, such as renaming and rearranging file folders. Karia noted, “slowly they'll start to try it, and once they get hooked on it then they are fine and the excitement kicks in.”
Curzio added that because any technology implementation is also a cultural change, new tools can't be ignored by users with the expectation that they're only a passing fad. Such reluctance should be met with “a lot of ongoing continuous encouragement and you have to be responsive,” he said.
While the path to adopting new tech can be a long, winding and expensive road, it shouldn't scare tech directors from championing for changes, Carmel said. He noted that since tech directors are the ones that witness the disconnect between users and software, they must find a better solution that fits users needs and the organization's goals.
“Your organization looks to you to explain those ideas,” he said. “If we don't bring these new ideas into the organization, nothing will change.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250