As Regulatory Pressures Intensify, Microsoft Updates its Compliance Manager
Law firms aren't the only ones providing compliance support. Microsoft unveiled updates to its Compliance Manager that allows users to track how compliant on-premises and non-Microsoft applications are to various regulations.
May 13, 2019 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
Data compliance is—or at the very least should be—top of mind for any organization, including law firms. As data privacy laws sprout in various countries and U.S. states, so too are automated compliance tools that look to address clients' need for regulatory guidance.
Microsoft has also become part of that growing market with the recent updates of its tool Compliance Manager, which like its counterparts, advises customers if their security controls meet the requirements of various laws. However, Microsoft touts the compliance tool's central location, unlike standalone tools, for ongoing risk assessment as a key differentiator.
The Compliance Manager's new features include enabling users to create their own assessments—including for on-premises and non-Microsoft applications—against any regulation or standard. An additional new feature is the add-on's ability to automatically update the status of a newly implemented security control.
When testing an application's compliance with a number of regulations, users are given an application's compliance score, test date, what organization tested it and further details regarding the implementation and test details.
Users can track their application's compliance to a plethora of regulations and standards, according to Microsoft. These include the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR); Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA); NIST 800-53; ISO 27001-2013; Dynamics NIST 800-53; and Azure ISO 27001:2013.
Microsoft 365 product marketing director Hye Jun also said Microsoft plans to add security controls to its Compliance Manager to help with the California Consumer Privacy Act, which goes into effect in 2020, and is still being finalized.
To be sure, Microsoft programs are widely used by most law firms and corporate legal departments. In 2018, nearly 98% of lawyers said they used Microsoft Word for word processing and Microsoft Excel for spreadsheets, according to the American Bar Association's 2018 TechReport. That dominance in the workforce aside, Microsoft said the update to its Compliance Manager was in part a response to a growing regulatory landscape, a proliferation of unstructured data and an increase in compliance costs.
While Jun acknowledged more law firms are offering information governance services for clients' regulatory pressures, she billed the Compliance Manager as a “one-stop tool for customers to assess their compliance posture” unlike tools that aren't integrated into users' workflow.
The updates to Compliance Manager come just weeks after Microsoft also announced updates to its Office 365 e-discovery capabilities.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250