LexisNexis Updates CounselLink, With Greater Scrutiny on Outside Counsel Management
LexisNexis CounselLink unveiled a new set of features designed to assist corporate law departments with tracking tasks and take a more metric-driven approach to choosing outside counsel.
May 13, 2019 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
CounselLink is a cloud-based enterprise legal management solution that has been with LexisNexis for about 15 years now. Earlier iterations had focused predominantly on helping organizations save money via its in-house auditing capabilities. But times have changed.
This week CounselLink will introduce a bundle of new features geared towards helping corporate legal departments take a more holistic approach to managing their work. Updates include everything from monitoring tasks in greater to detail to creating metric-driven overviews of outside legal providers, which should come in handy as legal departments strive to prove their worth inside of large-scale organizations.
What it is: The new additions to the menu launched this week focused on enabling organizations to better track, organize and audit the work being performed within their legal departments. The task tracking feature, for example, allows users to monitor the status of a project, send reminders, log progress and look towards what's next. “You can really at a glance understand what's happening and what's next, where we are in the process,” said Aaron Pierce, general manager of CounselLink.
Also of note is the vendor score card, which allows legal departments to review the work of outside counsel, including aggregate billing hours and an overall score that ranges from 0-100. More detailed reviews —complete with star-rating— can be left towards the bottom of the screen. “I think what you'll see is a really strong push in the industry today for corporations to take a lot more metric and data-based approach to how they manage and work with their outside counsel,” Pierce said.
Under the hood: CounselLink is cloud-based, meaning that users can log in from anywhere with secure authentication. It was also designed to be mobile ready to work on laptops, phones or tablets.
The layout of the platform was also designed to somewhat customizable, so that a paralegal can structure the position of, say, the invoice pane according to their priorities, which might differ from those of someone working in legal operations.
Why it's necessary: Lawyers are looking towards products that take a more holistic and comprehensive approach to servicing their needs. “Really the direction now… trying to minimize the number of different folks that you work with, consolidating your technology solutions around one solution. And so that's really the focus for us as well,” Pierce said.
There are also cultural shifts within the corporate legal departments themselves to consider as organizations look to reduce operating costs. “Legal departments are a little bit unique. I think that you're going to see a higher drive to efficiency and reduction of costs that you might not otherwise see as a result of having to be more of a cost center and less of a center for revenue and profitability,” Pierce said.
The Competition: Enterprise legal management solutions don't constitute a very exclusive club. Companies such as Thomson Reuters, Onit and Wolters Kluwer also have horses in the race, but Pierce thinks that CounselLink's ability to incorporate law firm invoices that arrive in the form of an email, a PDF or even on paper helps set it apart.
“Unique to other providers in our industry and really a key differentiator for us is that we capture 100 percent of the legal spending that your legal department might have with outside counsel,” Pierce said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250