Are the Gates Separating Law Firm Managers From New Innovations Too High?
Those wanting to test out innovative tech in-house must first get past their firms' “gatekeepers” who are empowered to limit spending on tech, and essentially block access to vendors and key partners.
May 14, 2019 at 07:39 PM
3 minute read
Getting innovation through the door of a law firm is easier said than done. The “Overcoming Structural Impediments to Adoption of Tech Solutions” panel held Tuesday during the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) 2019 institute dove into some of the challenges firms face in adopting new tech solutions.
Two of the main problems identified were intertwined: managers need greater exposure to some of the tech solutions on the marketplace, but “gatekeepers” within the firm empowered to limit spending on tech can block access to vendors and key partners.
“I think in general law firms look at technology as a expense,” Pat Archbold, vice president of the leaders and partners practice at Intapp, said.
There are other practical obstacles to consider as well. Alan Bryan, senior associate general counsel for Walmart Inc., pointed out that clients can be a significant force behind the adoption of new technology, but there is a hurdle in getting them comfortable with how new solutions will work and the reliability of the results delivered.
He also argued for finding ways to use or implement a new piece of technology that doesn't require broad, systemic changes within an organization.
“The more you can break down the buy-in and the cost, the more legal innovation you're going to see,” Bryan said.
A willingness to embrace innovation is crucial not only for the law firms, but tech companies as well. While he acknowledged that the “gatekeeper” role within firms is a necessary one, Josh Becker, chairman of Lex Machina, has experienced some of the frustrations emanating from the other side of the fence.
He recalled a period from earlier in his career where it took years to get a product in front of a law firm's managing partner. Once partners had the opportunity to evaluate the solution and cast their vote, the solution was adopted within five days. Becker argued that if a new technology can't find an adopter, it will eventually die.
“We need people who are going to try things out and give them a shot within firms,” Becker said.
Tessa Schwartz, a managing partner at Morrison & Foerster, posited that the work done by law firms and their chief information officers wasn't so much about keeping all vendors out, but rather letting the right ones inside the gates.
She said that firms are focused on leveraging innovation to meet increasing client demands. However, a point in the right direction would be helpful.
“What we really need help with is finding the right partners so that we can really invest,” Schwartz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
- 2Divided State Supreme Court Clears the Way for Child Sexual Abuse Cases Against Church, Schools
- 3From Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
- 4‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?
- 5LinkedIn Accused of Sharing LinkedIn Learning Video Data With Meta
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250