Why Contract Data Holds the Key to Legal Operations' Value
A panel at the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium 2019 institute explored how the data within contracts can help corporate legal departments bring value to their organization's financial health.
May 14, 2019 at 04:29 PM
3 minute read
A show of hands indicated that a majority of audience in attendance at the “Leveraging Contract Data for Data Driven Decision-Making” panel would have been reluctant to board a plane without any instruments in the cockpit — even if that plane was headed to Las Vegas for this year's Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) 2019 institute, where the panel took place on day one.
In this case, airplane instruments were a handy metaphor for contract data and all of the various ways a corporation and it's legal department need to be thinking about how they can leverage that intelligence to keep their bird in the air.
Panelist Chris Young, general counsel at Ironclad Inc., pointed out that these days, contracts touch every department within an organization, from finance to marketing to HR. But it's the staff in the legal department that may benefit the most from the metadata contained from the agreements.
“Legal ops has an unprecedented opportunity to contribute to the business,” said Young. Legal departments typically don't represent an area of revenue for an organization, but creatively utilized contract data can potentially add to the bottom line of a company.
Young argued that automatic renewals buried with a contract, for example, could potentially cost a company tens of thousands of dollars a year. Being aware of when those renewals might kick in and terminating them as necessary could represent a big save on spend.
Speaking of saving big on spend, insights into contracting processes and workflows can also help legal departments boost efficiency and recognize potential gaps in their process.
For instance, a legal department could look at the total contracts completed during a given period, the average number of days it took to complete those contracts or even the average number of days devoted to each step in the process. Unfortunately, collecting process data is not always easy.
“Every contract likely touches multiple stakeholders and that can cause a lot of conflict and inefficiencies,” said Efren Bonner, a legal engineer at Ironclad.
Inefficiently stored contracts could be lost to a co-workers inbox or piled under a stack of documents somewhere. Attempts to track the multitude of contracts in an organization can also be cumbersome. Bonner used Google as an example. At one point the company attempted to use an Excel spreadsheet to keep track of its contracts. By the end of the year, that document took 20 minutes just to load.
To help add some structure to the process, Bonner said that people need to think about the data that will truly matter to their company or the reports that they will need to fill out six months from now. Data collection should also be implemented throughout the contract process rather than treated like a book report that is hastily assembled the night before it's due.
Angela Mendenhall, senior corporate paralegal at Impossible Foods Inc., suggested speaking with the heads of each department to get a sense of what contract information they need to prioritize in order to function. Once established, a plan should also be able to constantly evolve.
“You might get to a year from now and realize that [the plan] didn't work for you,” said Mendenhall.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250