Why E-Discovery Savings Is About Department Value for Corporate Legal
CLOC's "A Tale of Two eDiscovery Operating Models" panel examined some of the opportunities that come from streamlining e-discovery and information governance inside corporate legal departments.
May 16, 2019 at 01:00 PM
3 minute read
The “A Tale of Two eDiscovery Operating Models” panel held Wednesday during the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) 2019 Institute in Las Vegas examined the ways in which corporate legal departments can leverage e-discovery and information governance processes to add value to their organizations.
Finding ways to defray costs is of special importance to legal departments since most typically don't generate revenue for a company.
“The main thing is showing your value. We need to be better about focusing on our accomplishments and raising them up,” said Wendy Riggs, lead of information governance and legal operations at Airbnb.
Riggs was joined on the panel by Melissa DeHonney, who serves as corporate counsel at the pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk. Both stressed the importance of collecting data or metrics that demonstrate costs saved and establishing a baseline by which to mark improvement.
It's a good way to catch the attention of higher-ups within the company who are splitting their attention among multiple departments and other pressing needs.
“They're focused on things with much greater risk exposures than getting e-discovery processes right, but that's such a critical component,” DeHonney said.
But what exactly are some of the things that corporate e-discovery or information governance professionals can do to yield results worth sharing in the first place? When Riggs and DeHonney first arrived at their respective companies, outside counsel were still driving the majority of the e-discovery process.
In Riggs' case, that meant that data belonging to her company was sitting out with a variety of different vendors. One of the first things she focused on when arriving at Airbnb was create a living data map to help keep track of where all of the company's information was located.
Sometimes that includes telling co-workers where not to keep data. “We've spent a lot of time helping people understand that email is not an information repository,” Riggs said.
Along similar lines, DeHonney advised the audience to consider using a single vendor model to drive standardization and efficiency. Both she and Riggs have also now established parameters that outside counsel need to follow in terms of how they handle e-discovery.
All of this is done with the purpose of driving improvements and positive results, which can in turn potentially feed investments in new hires and technology within the department.
“It's getting that attention of leadership and saying we're doing something important here and getting even more vocal,” DeHonney said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Understanding the HEMS Standard in Trusts
- 2Mergers Are About People, Not Paperwork: Here’s Why
- 3Wachtell Partner Leaves to Chair Latham's Liability Management Practice
- 4Morris Nichols Partners to Be Involved With PLI Program
- 5How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Cultivating a Culture of Mutual Trust Is Essential,' Says Gina Piazza of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250