Why E-Discovery Savings Is About Department Value for Corporate Legal
CLOC's "A Tale of Two eDiscovery Operating Models" panel examined some of the opportunities that come from streamlining e-discovery and information governance inside corporate legal departments.
May 16, 2019 at 01:00 PM
3 minute read
The “A Tale of Two eDiscovery Operating Models” panel held Wednesday during the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) 2019 Institute in Las Vegas examined the ways in which corporate legal departments can leverage e-discovery and information governance processes to add value to their organizations.
Finding ways to defray costs is of special importance to legal departments since most typically don't generate revenue for a company.
“The main thing is showing your value. We need to be better about focusing on our accomplishments and raising them up,” said Wendy Riggs, lead of information governance and legal operations at Airbnb.
Riggs was joined on the panel by Melissa DeHonney, who serves as corporate counsel at the pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk. Both stressed the importance of collecting data or metrics that demonstrate costs saved and establishing a baseline by which to mark improvement.
It's a good way to catch the attention of higher-ups within the company who are splitting their attention among multiple departments and other pressing needs.
“They're focused on things with much greater risk exposures than getting e-discovery processes right, but that's such a critical component,” DeHonney said.
But what exactly are some of the things that corporate e-discovery or information governance professionals can do to yield results worth sharing in the first place? When Riggs and DeHonney first arrived at their respective companies, outside counsel were still driving the majority of the e-discovery process.
In Riggs' case, that meant that data belonging to her company was sitting out with a variety of different vendors. One of the first things she focused on when arriving at Airbnb was create a living data map to help keep track of where all of the company's information was located.
Sometimes that includes telling co-workers where not to keep data. “We've spent a lot of time helping people understand that email is not an information repository,” Riggs said.
Along similar lines, DeHonney advised the audience to consider using a single vendor model to drive standardization and efficiency. Both she and Riggs have also now established parameters that outside counsel need to follow in terms of how they handle e-discovery.
All of this is done with the purpose of driving improvements and positive results, which can in turn potentially feed investments in new hires and technology within the department.
“It's getting that attention of leadership and saying we're doing something important here and getting even more vocal,” DeHonney said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250