Cost and Confusion: Legal Struggles to Understand, Deploy New Technologies
Bloomberg Law's Legal Operations & Technology survey found that just under a quarter of legal offices use AI. But a similar amount also can't say if they do or not.
May 17, 2019 at 07:30 AM
3 minute read
Tight budgets and lack of knowledge are hindering the legal industry's ability to leverage the latest technologies, according to Bloomberg Law's Legal Operations & Technology survey of 128 legal departments and 359 law firms. Most of those surveyed were either general counsel or law firm partners.
Only 23% of respondents said they are currently using AI or machine-learning tools, though an additional 24% were unsure whether such technology was being deployed in their law firm or legal department.
Molly Huie, team lead, Data Analytics and Surveys at Bloomberg Law, noted that the high rate of uncertainty around AI usage “reflects a knowledge gap—perhaps the tech they have is using AI.” She added that it is possible that AI usage, therefore, may be higher.
Among those using AI, almost half leveraged it in document review, while 41% specifically singled out e-discovery. What's more, around one-third, 31%, said they also used AI in legal research, while around 23% deployed it in litigation analytics and document drafting.
The situation was a little different within small legal departments. The most prevalent use for AI among in-house teams with 50 attorneys or less was both legal research and document review, while in legal departments with 51 attorneys or more, it was solely document review.
A majority of respondents in the survey noted that AI and legal technology would help their services become more efficient, which was a chief expectation among clients. But not all legal teams were able or eager to adopt new technologies. A majority of in-house respondents (55%), for example, said they don't have the budget to acquire or develop new technology.
Huie noted that this barrier presents “a catch-22,” because while legal departments are striving to become leaner operations, “without those new technologies, they aren't seeing those efficiencies and cost savings.”
Cost, however, wasn't the only barrier to tech adoption. Almost half of in-house respondents and a third of law firm respondents also noted they were too busy to learn new technologies. What's more, around 30% of both in-house and law firm respondents said they don't know enough about new technologies to buy them, and were comfortable using their current tools.
Of course, there are other ways for law firms and legal departments to drive efficiencies. Almost all respondents, 89%, noted having a legal ops function in their office. For around 45% of respondents, the scope of that function included records and vendor management, while for around 40%, it further included training and procurement. Slightly more than a third, 36%, also had their legal ops handle knowledge management within their offices.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250