Wilson Sonsini's Tech Subsidiary Releases First Product: An Automated CCPA Compliance Tool
Wilson Sonsini's tech subsidiary SixFifty aims to automate data privacy expertise for some companies that can't otherwise afford Big Law invoices.
May 22, 2019 at 09:15 AM
4 minute read
Today Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's wholly owned legal tech subsidiary took a step forward in becoming a fully fledged tech developer by releasing its first product: a California Consumer Privacy Act compliance tool named SixFifty Privacy.
Wilson Sonsini launched its technology company SixFifty, which is named after the Silicon Valley-based firm's Palo Alto, California, address, earlier this year. At the time of SixFity's launch, the firm said its technology would be geared toward automating legal services for companies and consumers, so it's little surprise the subsidiary set its sights on automating some of the requirements needed under the CCPA.
SixFifty Privacy provides companies of any size with an automated process to map a company's data flow and provides employee training videos regarding consumer rights and requests for access and deletion.
Additionally, the solutions allows companies to automate consumer requests intake. In a demo shown to Legaltech News, SixFifty Privacy quickly generated a portal and link for a company's consumers to request their data be deleted, not sold or to learn what data was shared. The portal also includes consumer verification to confirm a request is from an actual customer, a requirement under the CCPA.
What's more, the compliance tool further also allows a company to auto generate a CCPA compliance policy and consumer rights policy, CCPA related contract addendums and data handling policy documents, and a CCPA privacy notice for websites. All of those documents are created after the company fills out a few questions that include listing the name of the organization and any involved third parties.
SixFifty president Kimball Parker noted Wilson Sonsini's privacy and data protection team, including former deputy director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection Christopher Olsen, wrote the compliance documents, helped scope the questions needed to fill out the documents and policies and developed the training videos' scripts.
While packaging and automating that know-how was essential for the project, the affordability of the service was also key, Parker said.
With the CCPA's Jan. 1, 2020, enactment approaching, some 500,000 U.S. companies will fall under the regulation's scope. While many companies and their counsel are preparing for the new requirements, not all have the budget to spend on compliance.
“Basically we are trying to make Wilson Sonsini available to an entirely different subset of companies,” Parker said.
To be sure, while Wilson Sonsini partners provide the expertise found in SixFifty Privacy, subscribers won't be charged the comparative billable hours.
“What we've done is look at the price to use another big law firm to do those things and tried to price our project at one-fifth or one-tenth that cost,” Parker noted.
He explained users can buy the modules of the tool “a la carte.” The documents feature starts at $7,500 plus a $2,000 annual fee. For consumer request links, SixFifty Privacy charges $5,000 a year for the service, however if a company is processing a thousand-plus requests a year they'll be charged a higher amount. It also costs $50-$100 per trainee to watch the tool's video while the data mapping feature costs $7,500 or more with a 2,000 annual renewal fee.
Parker also noted that SixFifty Privacy will be routinely updated by Wilson Sonsini attorneys to adhere to the most up-to-date case law, amendments and other developments that impact the CCPA.
As SixFifty releases its CCPA compliance product, a survey found nearly half of U.S. technology, manufacturing, financial services, utilities and health care companies haven't started CCPA compliance. Meanwhile, a plethora of other CCPA compliance regulation tools are cropping up, including law firm Parsons Behle & Latimer subsidiary's CCPA IQ and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe's CCPA Readiness Assessment Tool.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250