Wilson Sonsini's Tech Subsidiary Releases First Product: An Automated CCPA Compliance Tool
Wilson Sonsini's tech subsidiary SixFifty aims to automate data privacy expertise for some companies that can't otherwise afford Big Law invoices.
May 22, 2019 at 09:15 AM
4 minute read
Today Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's wholly owned legal tech subsidiary took a step forward in becoming a fully fledged tech developer by releasing its first product: a California Consumer Privacy Act compliance tool named SixFifty Privacy.
Wilson Sonsini launched its technology company SixFifty, which is named after the Silicon Valley-based firm's Palo Alto, California, address, earlier this year. At the time of SixFity's launch, the firm said its technology would be geared toward automating legal services for companies and consumers, so it's little surprise the subsidiary set its sights on automating some of the requirements needed under the CCPA.
SixFifty Privacy provides companies of any size with an automated process to map a company's data flow and provides employee training videos regarding consumer rights and requests for access and deletion.
Additionally, the solutions allows companies to automate consumer requests intake. In a demo shown to Legaltech News, SixFifty Privacy quickly generated a portal and link for a company's consumers to request their data be deleted, not sold or to learn what data was shared. The portal also includes consumer verification to confirm a request is from an actual customer, a requirement under the CCPA.
What's more, the compliance tool further also allows a company to auto generate a CCPA compliance policy and consumer rights policy, CCPA related contract addendums and data handling policy documents, and a CCPA privacy notice for websites. All of those documents are created after the company fills out a few questions that include listing the name of the organization and any involved third parties.
SixFifty president Kimball Parker noted Wilson Sonsini's privacy and data protection team, including former deputy director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection Christopher Olsen, wrote the compliance documents, helped scope the questions needed to fill out the documents and policies and developed the training videos' scripts.
While packaging and automating that know-how was essential for the project, the affordability of the service was also key, Parker said.
With the CCPA's Jan. 1, 2020, enactment approaching, some 500,000 U.S. companies will fall under the regulation's scope. While many companies and their counsel are preparing for the new requirements, not all have the budget to spend on compliance.
“Basically we are trying to make Wilson Sonsini available to an entirely different subset of companies,” Parker said.
To be sure, while Wilson Sonsini partners provide the expertise found in SixFifty Privacy, subscribers won't be charged the comparative billable hours.
“What we've done is look at the price to use another big law firm to do those things and tried to price our project at one-fifth or one-tenth that cost,” Parker noted.
He explained users can buy the modules of the tool “a la carte.” The documents feature starts at $7,500 plus a $2,000 annual fee. For consumer request links, SixFifty Privacy charges $5,000 a year for the service, however if a company is processing a thousand-plus requests a year they'll be charged a higher amount. It also costs $50-$100 per trainee to watch the tool's video while the data mapping feature costs $7,500 or more with a 2,000 annual renewal fee.
Parker also noted that SixFifty Privacy will be routinely updated by Wilson Sonsini attorneys to adhere to the most up-to-date case law, amendments and other developments that impact the CCPA.
As SixFifty releases its CCPA compliance product, a survey found nearly half of U.S. technology, manufacturing, financial services, utilities and health care companies haven't started CCPA compliance. Meanwhile, a plethora of other CCPA compliance regulation tools are cropping up, including law firm Parsons Behle & Latimer subsidiary's CCPA IQ and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe's CCPA Readiness Assessment Tool.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250