Philadelphia Court Shuts Down Website, E-Filing Over 'Virus Intrusion'
On Tuesday, a virus on 'a limited number of computers' in Philadelphia's court system lead to the court shutting down its site and some online filing services as a safety precaution. City officials and the court haven't said when all systems will go back online.
May 24, 2019 at 01:49 PM
3 minute read
Philadelphia's court system website was shut down Tuesday afternoon to “safeguard” its systems after the First Judicial District experienced a “virus intrusion on a limited number of computers,” said city spokesperson Mike Dunn. The city didn't provide details on when they expected to fully go back online.
The shutdown has left the First Judicial District's website, online civil docket search and the e-filing system for civil and criminal cases inaccessible. Public access to court filings through the city's public computers for criminal records, filings, motions and appeals were also down as of Friday afternoon.
Dunn said in an emailed press statement that the city's Office of Innovation and Technology, in conjunction with the First Judicial District, shut down certain court IT functions to “fully review and clean the operating systems. This is a necessary step to contain the virus.”
Dunn noted the intrusion wasn't a data breach nor a ransomware attack and that all court proceedings are taking place as scheduled.
Indeed, while the servers are down, the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania said emergency civil filings can be made in person in Room 296 at City Hall. “The judiciary is aware of the system outage and if filing deadlines are missed, the outage can be referenced if needed,” the court said in a tweet.
Meanwhile, all filings to the Trial Division of the First Judicial District are being accepted at the Office of Judicial Records, the court also wrote in a tweet. Legaltech News observed city employees at Room 296 manually filling out applicants' forms and time-stamping the documents as online filing remained down as of Friday afternoon.
The city hasn't given a clear indication of when all of the city's court system's functions will go back online. In an email Dunn said, “The team is working on restoring all functionality as quickly as possible.”
As the city works through the inconvenience, the shutdown brings into focus how it's not just the large private entities that face cybersecurity risks, said Philadelphia-based XPAN Law Group co-founder and managing partner Rebecca Rakoski.
Rakoski, who practices exclusively in cybersecurity and data privacy and has no direct knowledge of the Philadelphia incident, said the shutdown highlighted how cybersecurity should be a top concern for every organization.
“Cybersecurity is a huge issue today and everybody realizes we are all at risk; there is no group without risk or not subjected to risk. Everyone needs to be hyper vigilant.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250