UK's Solicitors Agency Hosts First Access to Justice Tech Competition
The Solicitors Regulation Authority and nonprofit Nesta launched a legal tech challenge to address the access to justice gap for everyday citizens and small businesses in England and Wales.
May 30, 2019 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
While legal technology is being leveraged by more law firms and being taught to more law students in the U.K., observers say those solutions are mostly geared toward commercial law and not the legal needs of the country's citizens and small businesses.
The Legal Access Challenge, a new legal tech challenge launched by nonprofit Nesta in partnership with the Solicitors Regulation Authority, is looking to change that. The competition, which started Wednesday, seeks to encourage access to justice legal tech development in the country.
Those with early or proof-of-concept stage solutions can submit an application until Aug. 11 on the competition's website. The judging panel, which will consist of individuals with entrepreneurial, technology, regulatory and access to justice experience, will pick four finalists. Nesta noted that the names of the judges will be published online after the application deadline closes.
In September, Nesta will also name the finalists and give them £50,000 each and assistance to help bring their product to market. Nesta Challenges' head of better markets Chris Gorst noted the assistance provided hasn't been specified. The winner is scheduled to be announced in March or April 2020 and will receive an additional £50,000.
Applicants will be judged on the “impact that solution will have on people or small businesses, evidence the team is capable of creating the solution and [their ability to] get it into peoples' or small businesses' hands,” Gorst said. Additionally, solutions will also be judged by their level of innovation in U.K. legal services.
The Legal Access Challenge marks the first legal technology competition for Nesta and the Solicitors Regulation Authority, which regulates solicitors in England and Wales. The SRA said the challenge represents the regulator's broader goal of ensuring solicitors meet its standards and to help the agency evolve to resolve legal challenges.
“Our job is to make sure that everyone can trust that solicitors and law firms meet the high standards we all expect, as well as creating an environment that can offer people affordable, accessible legal services,” said Solicitors Regulation Authority chair Anna Bradley. “But I know that far too many people and small businesses can't get legal help when they need it, so they can't defend or enforce their rights.”
Indeed, according to a survey released by Nesta Challenges, 58% of citizens in Wales and England say the legal system is not set up for ordinary people. What's more, 68% said high cost, followed by the uncertainty of the cost (56%) and knowing who to trust (37%), were key barriers to legal access for English and Welsh citizens.
That perception, Nesta said, was its reasoning for partnering with SRA and hosting the Legal Access Challenge.
The challenge also seeks to bring together a community of organizations that share an interest in innovating legal services for consumers and small businesses, Gorst added. Additionally, Nesta will work with the SRA to identify any regulatory barriers that are impending innovations to address legal gaps.
While Nesta will handle the day-to-day activities of the challenge, the SRA's £700,000 grant from the U.K. government's Regulators' Pioneer Fund, which it received in 2018, is being used to finance the challenge's rewards.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250