Seeing Evolving Demands, Law Firms Move to Support Legal Tech Education
Norton Rose Fulbright and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer are actively bolstering legal tech education programs, hoping they will better prepare future attorneys for the demands of an fast changing role.
May 31, 2019 at 07:30 AM
4 minute read
Law firms are taking a more hands-on approach to shaping the next generation employees and legal practitioners, and they aren't content to wait until the ink has dried on a law degree.
Case in point: Norton Rose Fulbright announced earlier this month that it had partnered with England's University of York to create a new law and technology course geared towards both third year law and computer science honors students. The program is scheduled to kick-off in January 2020 and will focus heavily on encouraging students to solve real-life access to justice problems.
According to Jeremy Coleman, innovation manager at Norton Rose Fulbright, the course wasn't designed as a direct pipeline for acquiring new and promising talent, but rather to elevate the bar within the industry in general.
“The universities were focusing very much on the legal aspect but not so much on the additional areas that I think we were seeing as being necessary for being a successful lawyer in the future,” said Coleman.
The future he's talking about appears to be largely digital. Third-year students at University of York who choose to take the law and technology course as an elective will be presented with substantiated access to justice problems sourced from a yet-to-be announced government agency. Students will then be required to propose and build solutions that can help address the issue at hand using BRYTER, a platform that allows users to automate workflows and decision processes.
To be sure, the law and technology course at University of York isn't the only recent example of law schools building legal tech into their curriculum. Last year, the Chicago-Kent College of Law at the Illinois Institute of Technology approved a Masters of Law degree in legal innovation set to launch in fall 2019. Georgia State University also maintains a Legal Analytics Lab where students have the opportunity to engage with real-world problems.
Law schools' move to focus more on legal tech comes as law firms reevaluate what it means to be a lawyer in the today's market. Coleman said clients now expect advice that moves beyond cut-and-dry legalese.
“When [clients] are going through these massive digital transformations, being a legal adviser is often not enough. You have to have the consciousness of what is the influence that technology is going to have,” Coleman said.
For law firms, that means beginning to think strategically about the roles and services they'll need to grow into the future. There will always be a place for lawyers inside a law firm, but engineers and data scientists are becoming valued members of legal teams as well.
Even if law students can't build an app from scratch, having some frame of reference can be conducive to inter-firm communication. Jessica Burdon, a global innovation consultant with Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, stressed the need for smooth collaborations between lawyers and engineers.
“It's important to ensure that they can both work together in terms of product development. … For instance to deliver to clients mobile apps or different ways of managing mass claims,” Burdon said.
Last fall, Freshfields was one of the firms announced to be taking part in The Manchester Law & Technology Initiative, an endeavor by the University of Manchester to explore the application of technology and innovation within the legal sphere. Burdon sees parallels between the work firms are doing with legal tech startups and the flow of ideas between universities—and their students.
She explained, “If you take sort of an unabashed, creative mind, I think they can come up with some very interesting ideas,”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250