Seeing Evolving Demands, Law Firms Move to Support Legal Tech Education
Norton Rose Fulbright and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer are actively bolstering legal tech education programs, hoping they will better prepare future attorneys for the demands of an fast changing role.
May 31, 2019 at 07:30 AM
4 minute read
Law firms are taking a more hands-on approach to shaping the next generation employees and legal practitioners, and they aren't content to wait until the ink has dried on a law degree.
Case in point: Norton Rose Fulbright announced earlier this month that it had partnered with England's University of York to create a new law and technology course geared towards both third year law and computer science honors students. The program is scheduled to kick-off in January 2020 and will focus heavily on encouraging students to solve real-life access to justice problems.
According to Jeremy Coleman, innovation manager at Norton Rose Fulbright, the course wasn't designed as a direct pipeline for acquiring new and promising talent, but rather to elevate the bar within the industry in general.
“The universities were focusing very much on the legal aspect but not so much on the additional areas that I think we were seeing as being necessary for being a successful lawyer in the future,” said Coleman.
The future he's talking about appears to be largely digital. Third-year students at University of York who choose to take the law and technology course as an elective will be presented with substantiated access to justice problems sourced from a yet-to-be announced government agency. Students will then be required to propose and build solutions that can help address the issue at hand using BRYTER, a platform that allows users to automate workflows and decision processes.
To be sure, the law and technology course at University of York isn't the only recent example of law schools building legal tech into their curriculum. Last year, the Chicago-Kent College of Law at the Illinois Institute of Technology approved a Masters of Law degree in legal innovation set to launch in fall 2019. Georgia State University also maintains a Legal Analytics Lab where students have the opportunity to engage with real-world problems.
Law schools' move to focus more on legal tech comes as law firms reevaluate what it means to be a lawyer in the today's market. Coleman said clients now expect advice that moves beyond cut-and-dry legalese.
“When [clients] are going through these massive digital transformations, being a legal adviser is often not enough. You have to have the consciousness of what is the influence that technology is going to have,” Coleman said.
For law firms, that means beginning to think strategically about the roles and services they'll need to grow into the future. There will always be a place for lawyers inside a law firm, but engineers and data scientists are becoming valued members of legal teams as well.
Even if law students can't build an app from scratch, having some frame of reference can be conducive to inter-firm communication. Jessica Burdon, a global innovation consultant with Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, stressed the need for smooth collaborations between lawyers and engineers.
“It's important to ensure that they can both work together in terms of product development. … For instance to deliver to clients mobile apps or different ways of managing mass claims,” Burdon said.
Last fall, Freshfields was one of the firms announced to be taking part in The Manchester Law & Technology Initiative, an endeavor by the University of Manchester to explore the application of technology and innovation within the legal sphere. Burdon sees parallels between the work firms are doing with legal tech startups and the flow of ideas between universities—and their students.
She explained, “If you take sort of an unabashed, creative mind, I think they can come up with some very interesting ideas,”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 2Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 3'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 4Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 5Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250