House Judiciary Committee Launches Antitrust Probe Into Dominant Tech Companies
The House Judiciary Committee is looking into large tech companies' market dominance and possible antitrust violations, as Silicon Valley's biggest names face increased scrutiny at home and in Europe.
June 04, 2019 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Congress is looking into big tech's market dominance with an antitrust probe launched by the House Judiciary Committee on Monday.
The Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law, chaired by Rep. David Cicilline, D-Rhode Island, will conduct a “top-to-bottom review” of a small group of dominant tech platforms that could have the “incentive and ability to harm the competitive process.” The bipartisan investigation will include a series of hearings held by the subcommittee and requests for relevant information.
“After four decades of weak antitrust enforcement and judicial hostility to antitrust cases, it is vital for Congress to step in to determine whether existing laws are adequate to tackle abusive conduct by platform gatekeepers or if we need new legislation,” Cicilline said in a press release Monday.
Congress' investigation comes as Silicon Valley's biggest players—Amazon, Google, Facebook and Apple—face increased antitrust scrutiny at home and in Europe. On Saturday, the Wall Street Journal reported the Department of Justice is preparing for an antitrust investigation of Mountain View, California-based Google.
In March, presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, outlined her plan to “break up the biggest tech companies,” including Facebook, Google and Amazon.
In the past year, Google has been hit with billions in antitrust-related fines in the European Union, where Google and Apple have also faced complaints. The EU's General Data Protection Regulation, which went into effect last year, has drawn increased attention to tech companies' data use, with some regulators concerned that big tech companies' access to consumer data provides an unfair advantage. Concerns over app store dominance and ad revenue have also been raised.
House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, said the investigation stems from concerns that “a handful of gatekeepers have come to capture control over key arteries of online commerce, content, and communications.”
“The Committee has a rich tradition of conducting studies and investigations to assess the threat of monopoly power in the U.S. economy,” Nadler said in a press release. “Given the growing tide of concentration and consolidation across our economy, it is vital that we investigate the current state of competition in digital markets and the health of the antitrust laws.”
Reps. Doug Collins, R-Georgia, and Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wisconsin, also backed the investigation. Sensenbrenner said Congress “must discuss how the regulatory framework is built to ensure fairness and competition” in the digital marketplace.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250